Anorthite Vs Chrysocolla
Origin
Not Available, Southern and central Africa
  
Southern and central Africa, Sixth Edition (2006)
  
Color
White, Reddish, Colorless, gray, White, Red, Reddish
  
Blue, Green, Blue, Brown
  
Streak
White
  
White, Blue, Green
  
For which Rashi?
Not Available
  
Taurus
  
Planet
Not Available
  
Venus
  
Element of Planets
Not Available
  
Water
  
How to Wear?
  
  
Finger
Not Available
  
Not Available
  
Ring Metal
Not Available
  
Not Available
  
Energy
Not Available
  
Receptive
  
Deities
Not Available
  
Venus
  
Not to wear with
Not Available
  
Not Available
  
Powers
Not Available
  
Love
  
Birthstone
  
  
Planetary
Not Available
  
Not Available
  
Talisman
Not Available
  
Not Available
  
Tenacity
Brittle
  
Brittle
  
Solubility
Not Available
  
Not Available
  
Durability
Not Available
  
Not Available
  
Specific Gravity
2.77
  
2.00-2.45
  
Fracture
Uneven, Uneven, Gems, Sixth Edition (2006)
  
Sub-Conchoidal, ConchoidalArthur Thomas, Gemstones (2009), Brittle
  
Cleavage
Perfect [001] good [010] poor [110]
  
none
  
Mohs Hardness
6-6.5
  
2-4
  
Chemical Composition
CaAl 2Si 2O 8Michael OâDonoghue , Gems, Sixth Edition (2006)
  
Cu2H2Si2O5(OH)4
  
Luster
Vitreous
  
Vitreous, Greasy
  
Pleochroism
colorless.
  
AbsentWalter Schumann
  
Dispersion
Not Available
  
None
  
Transparency
Transparent
  
Opaque
  
Refractive Index
1.575-1.588
  
1.460-1.570
  
Optic Character
Not Available
  
Not Available
  
Crystal System
Triclinic
  
monoclinic
  
Birefringence
0.012-0.013
  
0.023-0.050
  
Clarity
Transparent
  
Gemmological Tables (2004) More from other references
  
Physical
  
  
Neurological
Not Available
  
Not Available
  
Cardiovascular
Not Available
  
Not Available
  
Respiratory
Not Available
  
Not Available
  
Reproductive
Not Available
  
Not Available
  
Digestive
Not Available
  
Not Available
  
Psychology
Not Available
  
Not Available
  
Healing
Not Available
  
Not Available
  
Qualities Associated
Not Available
  
Not Available
  
Anorthite Vs Chrysocolla Fracture
Fracture is an important parameter when you compare Anorthite and Chrysocolla Physical Properties. It is necessary to understand the significance of these properties, before you compare Anorthite Vs Chrysocolla fracture. Whenever a gemstone chip breaks, it leaves a characteristic line along its breakage. Such lines are known as fracture and are used to identify the gemstones in their initial stages of production when they are in the form of rough minerals. Fracture is usually described with the terms “fibrous” and “splintery” to denote a fracture that usually leaves elongated and sharp edges. Fracture observed in Anorthite is Gems, Sixth Edition (2006), Uneven and Uneven. Chrysocolla fracture is Brittle, ConchoidalArthur Thomas, Gemstones (2009) and Sub-Conchoidal.
Anorthite Vs Chrysocolla Luster
A primary knowledge about Anorthite vs Chrysocolla luster is useful in apparent identifications of these gemstones. Luster is the measure of light that gets reflected when incident on a finished cut gemstone. There are two major types of lusters: Silky and Adamantine. Since luster varies between two crystals of even the same gemstone, luster is limited to basic identification criteria. Anorthite exhibits Vitreous luster. Chrysocolla, on other hand, exhibits Greasy and Vitreous luster.