Origin
Not Available, Southern and central Africa
  
Southern and central Africa
  
Color
Brown, White, Greenish, gray, Green, Brown, Brownish, White, Greenish, gray, Green, Brown, Brownish
  
Black, Reddish, gray, Red
  
Streak
gray
  
Black, Brown, Reddish, Red
  
For which Rashi?
Not Available
  
Aries, Aquarius, Aries, Aquarius, Aries, Aquarius
  
Planet
Not Available
  
Saturn
  
Element of Planets
Not Available
  
Not Available
  
How to Wear?
  
  
Finger
Not Available
  
Not Available
  
Ring Metal
Not Available
  
Not Available
  
Energy
Not Available
  
Projective
  
Deities
Not Available
  
Mars
  
Not to wear with
Not Available
  
Not Available
  
Powers
Not Available
  
Healing
  
Birthstone
  
  
Planetary
Not Available
  
Not Available
  
Talisman
Not Available
  
Not Available
  
Tenacity
Not Available
  
Brittle
  
Solubility
Not Available
  
Not Available
  
Durability
Not Available
  
Not Available
  
Specific Gravity
2.9-3.5
  
5.00-5.30
  
Fracture
Conchoidal, Brittle, Conchoidal, Brittle, Conchoidal, Brittle
  
Uneven, Uneven, ConchoidalWalter Schumann, Gemstones of the world (2001) More from other references, Conchoidal, Brittle
  
Cleavage
{110} Perfect, {???} Distinct, {???} Distinct
  
None, may show partings on {0001} and {10 1 1}
  
Mohs Hardness
5.5-6
  
6
  
Chemical Composition
(Mg,Fe2+ ) 2(Mg,Fe2+ ) 5Si 8O 22(OH) 2Anthony et al , Handbook of mineralogy (2001)
  
Fe 2O 3Arthur Thomas , Gemstones (2009)
  
Luster
Vitreous, Pearly
  
Not Available
  
Pleochroism
When Fe-rich
  
O = brownish red; E = yellowish red
  
Dispersion
Not Available
  
Not Available
  
Transparency
Transparent
  
OpaqueHerve Nicolas Lazzarelli, Blue Chart Gem Identification (2010) More from other references
  
Refractive Index
1.603-1.690
  
2.690-3.220
  
Optic Character
Biaxial/+
  
Not Available
  
Crystal System
Orthorhombic Dipyramidal H-M Symbol (2/m 2/m 2/m) Space Group: P nma
  
Trigonal
  
Birefringence
Not Available
  
0.280
  
Clarity
Transparent
  
OpaqueHerve Nicolas Lazzarelli
  
Physical
  
  
Neurological
Not Available
  
Not Available
  
Cardiovascular
Not Available
  
Not Available
  
Respiratory
Not Available
  
Not Available
  
Reproductive
Not Available
  
Not Available
  
Digestive
Not Available
  
Not Available
  
Psychology
Not Available
  
Not Available
  
Healing
Not Available
  
Not Available
  
Qualities Associated
Not Available
  
Not Available
  
Anthophyllite Vs Hematite Fracture
Fracture is an important parameter when you compare Anthophyllite and Hematite Physical Properties. It is necessary to understand the significance of these properties, before you compare Anthophyllite Vs Hematite fracture. Whenever a gemstone chip breaks, it leaves a characteristic line along its breakage. Such lines are known as fracture and are used to identify the gemstones in their initial stages of production when they are in the form of rough minerals. Fracture is usually described with the terms “fibrous” and “splintery” to denote a fracture that usually leaves elongated and sharp edges. Fracture observed in Anthophyllite is Brittle, Brittle, Brittle, Conchoidal, Conchoidal and Conchoidal. Hematite fracture is Brittle, Conchoidal, ConchoidalWalter Schumann, Gemstones of the world (2001) More from other references, Uneven and Uneven.
Anthophyllite Vs Hematite Luster
A primary knowledge about Anthophyllite vs Hematite luster is useful in apparent identifications of these gemstones. Luster is the measure of light that gets reflected when incident on a finished cut gemstone. There are two major types of lusters: Silky and Adamantine. Since luster varies between two crystals of even the same gemstone, luster is limited to basic identification criteria. Anthophyllite exhibits Pearly and Vitreous luster.