Origin
Mexico, USA, Canada, Madagascar, Spain, Russia, Sri Lanka, India, Burma, Color: green, greenish yellow, blue, violet, Hardness: 5, Refractive index: 1.60 1.67, Density: 3.17 3.35, Chemical composition: Phosphate composition, Crystal structure: hexagonal, Lustre: vitreous, Origins: Mexico, USA, Canada, Madagascar, Spain, Russia, Sri Lanka, India, brown, green, Yellow, violet, brown, green, Yellow, violet
Southern and central Africa, USA, Australia, Brazil, USA, Australia, Brazil, USA
Color
Yellow, Green, Blue, Blue, Green, White, Yellow, Green, Red, Blue, Green, Colorless, Yellow, Blue, Violet, pink, Brown
Green
Streak
White
Not Available
For which Rashi?
Gemini
Cancer, Taurus, Cancer, Taurus, Cancer, Taurus
Element of Planets
Earth
Earth
Finger
Not Available
Not Available
Ring Metal
Not Available
Not Available
Energy
Projective
Receptive
Deities
Jupiter/Neptune
Vesta
Not to wear with
Not Available
Not Available
Powers
Healing
Protection, Healing
Planetary
Not Available
Not Available
Talisman
Not Available
Not Available
Tenacity
Not Available
Not Available
Solubility
Not Available
Not Available
Durability
Not Available
Not Available
Specific Gravity
3.16-3.23
2.58-2.64
Fracture
Conchoidal, Uneven, Conchoidal, Brittle, ConchoidalArthur Thomas, Gemstones (2009), Conchoidal to uneven
Gems, Sixth Edition (2006)
Cleavage
[0001] indistinct, [1010] indistinct
None
Chemical Composition
Ca 5(PO 4) 3(F,OH,Cl)Walter Schumann , Gemstones of the world (2001) More from other references
SiO2 (with a high level of nickel impurities )
Luster
Vitreous
Vitreous, Vitreous, Waxy
Pleochroism
Blue stones – strong
AbsentWalter Schumann
Transparency
Gemmological Tables (2004) More from other references
Translucent, Translucent, Opaque, Translucent to nearly opaque
Refractive Index
1.628-1.651
1.530-1.543
Optic Character
Not Available
Not Available
Crystal System
Hexagonal
Trigonal
Birefringence
0.002-0.008
0.004
Clarity
TransparentUlrich Henn and Claudio C. Milisenda
Translucent
Neurological
Not Available
Not Available
Cardiovascular
Not Available
Not Available
Respiratory
Not Available
Not Available
Reproductive
Not Available
Not Available
Digestive
Not Available
Not Available
Psychology
Not Available
Not Available
Healing
Not Available
Not Available
Qualities Associated
Not Available
Not Available
Apatite Vs Chrysoprase Fracture
Fracture is an important parameter when you compare Apatite and Chrysoprase Physical Properties. It is necessary to understand the significance of these properties, before you compare Apatite Vs Chrysoprase fracture. Whenever a gemstone chip breaks, it leaves a characteristic line along its breakage. Such lines are known as fracture and are used to identify the gemstones in their initial stages of production when they are in the form of rough minerals. Fracture is usually described with the terms “fibrous” and “splintery” to denote a fracture that usually leaves elongated and sharp edges. Fracture observed in Apatite is Brittle, Conchoidal, Conchoidal, Conchoidal to uneven, ConchoidalArthur Thomas, Gemstones (2009) and Uneven. Chrysoprase fracture is Gems and Sixth Edition (2006).
Apatite Vs Chrysoprase Luster
A primary knowledge about Apatite vs Chrysoprase luster is useful in apparent identifications of these gemstones. Luster is the measure of light that gets reflected when incident on a finished cut gemstone. There are two major types of lusters: Silky and Adamantine. Since luster varies between two crystals of even the same gemstone, luster is limited to basic identification criteria. Apatite exhibits Vitreous luster. Chrysoprase, on other hand, exhibits Vitreous, Vitreous and Waxy luster.