Home
Gemstones


Bixbite Vs Chrysocolla


Chrysocolla Vs Bixbite


Astrology

Origin
USA   
Southern and central Africa, Sixth Edition (2006)   

Color
Red   
Blue, Green, Blue, Brown   

Streak
Not Available   
White, Blue, Green   

For which Rashi?
Taurus, Aries, Taurus, Aries, Taurus, Aries   
Taurus   

Planet
Moon   
Venus   

Element of Planets
Water   
Water   

How to Wear?
  
  

Finger
Not Available   
Not Available   

Ring Metal
Not Available   
Not Available   

Energy
Receptive   
Receptive   

Deities
Mars   
Venus   

Not to wear with
Not Available   
Not Available   

Powers
Not Available   
Love   

Birthstone
  
  

Planetary
Not Available   
Not Available   

Talisman
Not Available   
Not Available   

Physical Properties

Tenacity
Not Available   
Brittle   

Solubility
Not Available   
Not Available   

Durability
Not Available   
Not Available   

Specific Gravity
Not Available   
2.00-2.45   

Fracture
Not Available   
Sub-Conchoidal, ConchoidalArthur Thomas, Gemstones (2009), Brittle   

Cleavage
Not Available   
none   

Mohs Hardness
7.5   
2-4   

Chemical Composition
Not Available   
Cu2H2Si2O5(OH)4   

Optical Properties

Luster
Not Available   
Vitreous, Greasy   

Pleochroism
Not Available   
AbsentWalter Schumann   

Dispersion
Not Available   
None   

Transparency
Not Available   
Opaque   

Refractive Index
Not Available   
1.460-1.570   

Optic Character
Not Available   
Not Available   

Crystal System
Hexagonal   
monoclinic   

Birefringence
Not Available   
0.023-0.050   

Clarity
Not Available   
Gemmological Tables (2004) More from other references   

Benefits

Physical
  
  

Neurological
Not Available   
Not Available   

Cardiovascular
Not Available   
Not Available   

Respiratory
Not Available   
Not Available   

Reproductive
Not Available   
Not Available   

Digestive
Not Available   
Not Available   

Psychology
Not Available   
Not Available   

Healing
Not Available   
Not Available   

Qualities Associated
Not Available   
Not Available   

Astrology >>
<< All

Bixbite Vs Chrysocolla Fracture

Fracture is an important parameter when you compare Bixbite and Chrysocolla Physical Properties. It is necessary to understand the significance of these properties, before you compare Bixbite Vs Chrysocolla fracture. Whenever a gemstone chip breaks, it leaves a characteristic line along its breakage. Such lines are known as fracture and are used to identify the gemstones in their initial stages of production when they are in the form of rough minerals. Fracture is usually described with the terms “fibrous” and “splintery” to denote a fracture that usually leaves elongated and sharp edges. Chrysocolla fracture is Brittle, ConchoidalArthur Thomas, Gemstones (2009) and Sub-Conchoidal.

Compare Gems for Taurus

Bixbite Vs Chrysocolla Luster

A primary knowledge about Bixbite vs Chrysocolla luster is useful in apparent identifications of these gemstones. Luster is the measure of light that gets reflected when incident on a finished cut gemstone. There are two major types of lusters: Silky and Adamantine. Since luster varies between two crystals of even the same gemstone, luster is limited to basic identification criteria. Chrysocolla, on other hand, exhibits Greasy and Vitreous luster.

Taurus Gems

Taurus Gems

» More Taurus Gems

Compare Gems for Taurus

» More Compare Gems for Taurus