Chrysocolla Vs Anthophyllite
Origin
Southern and central Africa, Sixth Edition (2006)
Not Available, Southern and central Africa
Color
Blue, Green, Blue, Brown
Brown, White, Greenish, gray, Green, Brown, Brownish, White, Greenish, gray, Green, Brown, Brownish
Streak
White, Blue, Green
gray
For which Rashi?
Taurus
Not Available
Planet
Venus
Not Available
Element of Planets
Water
Not Available
Finger
Not Available
Not Available
Ring Metal
Not Available
Not Available
Energy
Receptive
Not Available
Deities
Venus
Not Available
Not to wear with
Not Available
Not Available
Powers
Love
Not Available
Planetary
Not Available
Not Available
Talisman
Not Available
Not Available
Tenacity
Brittle
Not Available
Solubility
Not Available
Not Available
Durability
Not Available
Not Available
Specific Gravity
2.00-2.45
2.9-3.5
Fracture
Sub-Conchoidal, ConchoidalArthur Thomas, Gemstones (2009), Brittle
Conchoidal, Brittle, Conchoidal, Brittle, Conchoidal, Brittle
Cleavage
none
{110} Perfect, {???} Distinct, {???} Distinct
Chemical Composition
Cu2H2Si2O5(OH)4
(Mg,Fe2+ ) 2(Mg,Fe2+ ) 5Si 8O 22(OH) 2Anthony et al , Handbook of mineralogy (2001)
Luster
Vitreous, Greasy
Vitreous, Pearly
Pleochroism
AbsentWalter Schumann
When Fe-rich
Dispersion
None
Not Available
Transparency
Opaque
Transparent
Refractive Index
1.460-1.570
1.603-1.690
Optic Character
Not Available
Biaxial/+
Crystal System
monoclinic
Orthorhombic Dipyramidal H-M Symbol (2/m 2/m 2/m) Space Group: P nma
Birefringence
0.023-0.050
Not Available
Clarity
Gemmological Tables (2004) More from other references
Transparent
Neurological
Not Available
Not Available
Cardiovascular
Not Available
Not Available
Respiratory
Not Available
Not Available
Reproductive
Not Available
Not Available
Digestive
Not Available
Not Available
Psychology
Not Available
Not Available
Healing
Not Available
Not Available
Qualities Associated
Not Available
Not Available
Chrysocolla Vs Anthophyllite Fracture
Fracture is an important parameter when you compare Chrysocolla and Anthophyllite Physical Properties. It is necessary to understand the significance of these properties, before you compare Chrysocolla Vs Anthophyllite fracture. Whenever a gemstone chip breaks, it leaves a characteristic line along its breakage. Such lines are known as fracture and are used to identify the gemstones in their initial stages of production when they are in the form of rough minerals. Fracture is usually described with the terms “fibrous” and “splintery” to denote a fracture that usually leaves elongated and sharp edges. Fracture observed in Chrysocolla is Brittle, ConchoidalArthur Thomas, Gemstones (2009) and Sub-Conchoidal. Anthophyllite fracture is Brittle, Brittle, Brittle, Conchoidal, Conchoidal and Conchoidal.
Chrysocolla Vs Anthophyllite Luster
A primary knowledge about Chrysocolla vs Anthophyllite luster is useful in apparent identifications of these gemstones. Luster is the measure of light that gets reflected when incident on a finished cut gemstone. There are two major types of lusters: Silky and Adamantine. Since luster varies between two crystals of even the same gemstone, luster is limited to basic identification criteria. Chrysocolla exhibits Greasy and Vitreous luster. Anthophyllite, on other hand, exhibits Pearly and Vitreous luster.