Chrysocolla Vs Hambergite
Origin
Southern and central Africa, Sixth Edition (2006)
  
the type locality
  
Color
Blue, Green, Blue, Brown
  
Colorless, gray, White
  
Streak
White, Blue, Green
  
White
  
For which Rashi?
Taurus
  
Not Available
  
Planet
Venus
  
Not Available
  
Element of Planets
Water
  
Not Available
  
How to Wear?
  
  
Finger
Not Available
  
Not Available
  
Ring Metal
Not Available
  
Not Available
  
Energy
Receptive
  
Not Available
  
Deities
Venus
  
Not Available
  
Not to wear with
Not Available
  
Not Available
  
Powers
Love
  
Not Available
  
Birthstone
  
  
Planetary
Not Available
  
Not Available
  
Talisman
Not Available
  
Not Available
  
Tenacity
Brittle
  
Brittle
  
Solubility
Not Available
  
Not Available
  
Durability
Not Available
  
Not Available
  
Specific Gravity
2.00-2.45
  
2.33-2.37
  
Fracture
Sub-Conchoidal, ConchoidalArthur Thomas, Gemstones (2009), Brittle
  
ConchoidalWalter Schumann, ConchoidalWalter Schumann, Gemstones of the world (2001) More from other references, Brittle, Metallic
  
Cleavage
none
  
Perfect on {010}, good on {100}
  
Mohs Hardness
2-4
  
7.5
  
Chemical Composition
Cu2H2Si2O5(OH)4
  
Be 2BO 3(OH)Ulrich Henn and Claudio C.
  
Luster
Vitreous, Greasy
  
Vitreous
  
Pleochroism
AbsentWalter Schumann
  
NilArthur Thomas
  
Dispersion
None
  
Transparency
Opaque
  
Transparent
  
Refractive Index
1.460-1.570
  
1.543-1.631
  
Optic Character
Not Available
  
Not Available
  
Crystal System
monoclinic
  
Orthorhombic
  
Birefringence
0.023-0.050
  
0.071-0.074
  
Clarity
Gemmological Tables (2004) More from other references
  
Transparent
  
Physical
  
  
Neurological
Not Available
  
Not Available
  
Cardiovascular
Not Available
  
Not Available
  
Respiratory
Not Available
  
Not Available
  
Reproductive
Not Available
  
Not Available
  
Digestive
Not Available
  
Not Available
  
Psychology
Not Available
  
Not Available
  
Healing
Not Available
  
Not Available
  
Qualities Associated
Not Available
  
Not Available
  
Chrysocolla Vs Hambergite Fracture
Fracture is an important parameter when you compare Chrysocolla and Hambergite Physical Properties. It is necessary to understand the significance of these properties, before you compare Chrysocolla Vs Hambergite fracture. Whenever a gemstone chip breaks, it leaves a characteristic line along its breakage. Such lines are known as fracture and are used to identify the gemstones in their initial stages of production when they are in the form of rough minerals. Fracture is usually described with the terms “fibrous” and “splintery” to denote a fracture that usually leaves elongated and sharp edges. Fracture observed in Chrysocolla is Brittle, ConchoidalArthur Thomas, Gemstones (2009) and Sub-Conchoidal. Hambergite fracture is Brittle, ConchoidalWalter Schumann, ConchoidalWalter Schumann, Gemstones of the world (2001) More from other references and Metallic.
Chrysocolla Vs Hambergite Luster
A primary knowledge about Chrysocolla vs Hambergite luster is useful in apparent identifications of these gemstones. Luster is the measure of light that gets reflected when incident on a finished cut gemstone. There are two major types of lusters: Silky and Adamantine. Since luster varies between two crystals of even the same gemstone, luster is limited to basic identification criteria. Chrysocolla exhibits Greasy and Vitreous luster. Hambergite, on other hand, exhibits Vitreous luster.