Origin
USA, Brazyl, Austria, Italy, Tanzania, Pakistan, Russia, Sri Lanka, Burma, Color: green, yellow-green, Not Available, Not Available, Not Available, Hardness: 5.5 6, Refractive index: 1.66 1.71, Density: 3.25 3.55, Chemical composition: CaMg(Si2O6), Crystal structure: monoclinic, Origins: USA, Brazyl, Austria, Italy, Tanzania, Pakistan, Russia, Sri Lanka
China
Color
Yellow, Colorless, Brown, Blue, Brown, Colorless, Green, gray
Red, Colorless, Red
Streak
White, White, Green
White
For which Rashi?
Not Available
Not Available
Planet
Not Available
Not Available
Element of Planets
Not Available
Not Available
Finger
Not Available
Not Available
Ring Metal
Not Available
Not Available
Energy
Not Available
Not Available
Deities
Not Available
Not Available
Not to wear with
Not Available
Not Available
Powers
Not Available
Not Available
Planetary
Not Available
Not Available
Talisman
Not Available
Not Available
Tenacity
Brittle
Not Available
Solubility
Not Available
Not Available
Durability
Not Available
Not Available
Specific Gravity
3.22-3.40
3.50
Fracture
Conchoidal, UnevenWalter Schumann, Gemstones of the world (2001) More from other references, Brittle, Conchoidal
Uneven, Uneven, ConchoidalAnthony et al, Handbook of mineralogy (2001), Conchoidal, Uneven
Cleavage
Distinct/good on {110}
None
Chemical Composition
CaMgSi2O6
Mn 3B 7O 13ClMichael OâDonoghue , Gems, Sixth Edition (2006)
Pleochroism
Not Available
Not Available
Transparency
Transparent, Translucent, Not Available, Transparent . Star Diopside is opaque .
Gemmological Tables (2004) More from other references
Refractive Index
1.664-1.730
1.735-1.745
Optic Character
Not Available
Not Available
Crystal System
monoclinic
Orthorhombic
Birefringence
0.024-0.030
0.012
Clarity
Transparent
TransparentUlrich Henn and Claudio C. Milisenda
Neurological
Not Available
Not Available
Cardiovascular
Not Available
Not Available
Respiratory
Not Available
Not Available
Reproductive
Not Available
Not Available
Digestive
Not Available
Not Available
Psychology
Not Available
Not Available
Healing
Not Available
Not Available
Qualities Associated
Not Available
Not Available
Diopside Vs Chambersite Fracture
Fracture is an important parameter when you compare Diopside and Chambersite Physical Properties. It is necessary to understand the significance of these properties, before you compare Diopside Vs Chambersite fracture. Whenever a gemstone chip breaks, it leaves a characteristic line along its breakage. Such lines are known as fracture and are used to identify the gemstones in their initial stages of production when they are in the form of rough minerals. Fracture is usually described with the terms “fibrous” and “splintery” to denote a fracture that usually leaves elongated and sharp edges. Fracture observed in Diopside is Brittle, Conchoidal, Conchoidal, Gemstones of the world (2001) More from other references and UnevenWalter Schumann. Chambersite fracture is Conchoidal, ConchoidalAnthony et al, Handbook of mineralogy (2001), Uneven, Uneven and Uneven.
Diopside Vs Chambersite Luster
A primary knowledge about Diopside vs Chambersite luster is useful in apparent identifications of these gemstones. Luster is the measure of light that gets reflected when incident on a finished cut gemstone. There are two major types of lusters: Silky and Adamantine. Since luster varies between two crystals of even the same gemstone, luster is limited to basic identification criteria. Diopside exhibits Vitreous luster. Chambersite, on other hand, exhibits Vitreous luster.