Origin
USA, Brazyl, Austria, Italy, Tanzania, Pakistan, Russia, Sri Lanka, Burma, Color: green, yellow-green, Not Available, Not Available, Not Available, Hardness: 5.5 6, Refractive index: 1.66 1.71, Density: 3.25 3.55, Chemical composition: CaMg(Si2O6), Crystal structure: monoclinic, Origins: USA, Brazyl, Austria, Italy, Tanzania, Pakistan, Russia, Sri Lanka
USA
Color
Yellow, Colorless, Brown, Blue, Brown, Colorless, Green, gray
Yellow, Red, Green, Colorless, orange
Streak
White, White, Green
Yellow, yellowish orange
For which Rashi?
Not Available
Not Available
Planet
Not Available
Not Available
Element of Planets
Not Available
Not Available
Finger
Not Available
Not Available
Ring Metal
Not Available
Not Available
Energy
Not Available
Not Available
Deities
Not Available
Not Available
Not to wear with
Not Available
Not Available
Powers
Not Available
Not Available
Planetary
Not Available
Not Available
Talisman
Not Available
Not Available
Solubility
Not Available
Not Available
Durability
Not Available
Not Available
Specific Gravity
3.22-3.40
5.50-5.90
Fracture
Conchoidal, UnevenWalter Schumann, Gemstones of the world (2001) More from other references, Brittle, Conchoidal
Conchoidal, ConchoidalArthur Thomas, Gemstones (2009), Brittle
Cleavage
Distinct/good on {110}
On {10 1 0}, perfect; parting on {000 1 }
Chemical Composition
CaMgSi2O6
(Zn,Mn2+ )OMichael OâDonoghue , Gems, Sixth Edition (2006)
Luster
Vitreous
Subadamantine, Resinous
Pleochroism
Not Available
Very weak
Transparency
Transparent, Translucent, Not Available, Transparent . Star Diopside is opaque .
TransparentRobert C. Kammerling, The Journal of Gemmology (1995) More from other references
Refractive Index
1.664-1.730
2.013-2.029
Optic Character
Not Available
Not Available
Crystal System
monoclinic
Hexagonal
Birefringence
0.024-0.030
0.016
Clarity
Transparent
TransparentRobert C. Kammerling
Neurological
Not Available
Not Available
Cardiovascular
Not Available
Not Available
Respiratory
Not Available
Not Available
Reproductive
Not Available
Not Available
Digestive
Not Available
Not Available
Psychology
Not Available
Not Available
Healing
Not Available
Not Available
Qualities Associated
Not Available
Not Available
Diopside Vs Zincite Fracture
Fracture is an important parameter when you compare Diopside and Zincite Physical Properties. It is necessary to understand the significance of these properties, before you compare Diopside Vs Zincite fracture. Whenever a gemstone chip breaks, it leaves a characteristic line along its breakage. Such lines are known as fracture and are used to identify the gemstones in their initial stages of production when they are in the form of rough minerals. Fracture is usually described with the terms “fibrous” and “splintery” to denote a fracture that usually leaves elongated and sharp edges. Fracture observed in Diopside is Brittle, Conchoidal, Conchoidal, Gemstones of the world (2001) More from other references and UnevenWalter Schumann. Zincite fracture is Brittle, Conchoidal, ConchoidalArthur Thomas and Gemstones (2009).
Diopside Vs Zincite Luster
A primary knowledge about Diopside vs Zincite luster is useful in apparent identifications of these gemstones. Luster is the measure of light that gets reflected when incident on a finished cut gemstone. There are two major types of lusters: Silky and Adamantine. Since luster varies between two crystals of even the same gemstone, luster is limited to basic identification criteria. Diopside exhibits Vitreous luster. Zincite, on other hand, exhibits Resinous and Subadamantine luster.