Fluorapatite Vs Euclase
Origin
Southern and central Africa
  
Brazil, Colombia, Southern and central Africa
  
Color
Violet, Blue, Yellow, Brown, White, Colorless
  
Greenish, Blue, Colorless, White, Green
  
Streak
White
  
White
  
For which Rashi?
Not Available
  
Not Available
  
Planet
Not Available
  
Not Available
  
Element of Planets
Not Available
  
Not Available
  
How to Wear?
  
  
Finger
Not Available
  
Not Available
  
Ring Metal
Not Available
  
Not Available
  
Energy
Not Available
  
Not Available
  
Deities
Not Available
  
Not Available
  
Not to wear with
Not Available
  
Not Available
  
Powers
Not Available
  
Not Available
  
Birthstone
  
  
Planetary
Not Available
  
Not Available
  
Talisman
Not Available
  
Not Available
  
Tenacity
Not Available
  
Not Available
  
Solubility
Not Available
  
Not Available
  
Durability
Not Available
  
Not Available
  
Specific Gravity
3.1-3.25
  
3.08-3.12
  
Fracture
Uneven, Uneven, ConchoidalAnthony et al, Handbook of mineralogy (2001)
  
ConchoidalWalter Schumann, Gemstones of the world (2001), ConchoidalWalter Schumann, Gemstones of the world (2001), Brittle, Metallic
  
Cleavage
Indistinct
  
{010} Perfect
  
Mohs Hardness
5
  
7.5
  
Chemical Composition
Ca 5(PO 4) 3FAnthony et al , Handbook of mineralogy (2001)
  
BeAlSiO 4(OH)Michael OâDonoghue , Gems, Sixth Edition (2006) More from other references
  
Luster
Vitreous, Resinous
  
Vitreous
  
Pleochroism
Weak to strong if coloreD
  
Weak: colorless-(greenish) yellow
  
Dispersion
Not Available
  
Transparency
Transparent
  
Gemmological Tables (2004) More from other references
  
Refractive Index
1.631-1.650
  
1.650-1.677
  
Optic Character
Not Available
  
Not Available
  
Crystal System
Hexagonal
  
Monoclinic Prismatic H-M Symbol (2/m) Space Group: P 21/a
  
Birefringence
Not Available
  
0.019-0.025
  
Clarity
Transparent
  
TransparentUlrich Henn and Claudio C. Milisenda
  
Physical
  
  
Neurological
Not Available
  
Not Available
  
Cardiovascular
Not Available
  
Not Available
  
Respiratory
Not Available
  
Not Available
  
Reproductive
Not Available
  
Not Available
  
Digestive
Not Available
  
Not Available
  
Psychology
Not Available
  
Not Available
  
Healing
Not Available
  
Not Available
  
Qualities Associated
Not Available
  
Not Available
  
Fluorapatite Vs Euclase Fracture
Fracture is an important parameter when you compare Fluorapatite and Euclase Physical Properties. It is necessary to understand the significance of these properties, before you compare Fluorapatite Vs Euclase fracture. Whenever a gemstone chip breaks, it leaves a characteristic line along its breakage. Such lines are known as fracture and are used to identify the gemstones in their initial stages of production when they are in the form of rough minerals. Fracture is usually described with the terms “fibrous” and “splintery” to denote a fracture that usually leaves elongated and sharp edges. Fracture observed in Fluorapatite is ConchoidalAnthony et al, Handbook of mineralogy (2001), Uneven and Uneven. Euclase fracture is Brittle, ConchoidalWalter Schumann, ConchoidalWalter Schumann, Gemstones of the world (2001), Gemstones of the world (2001) and Metallic.
Fluorapatite Vs Euclase Luster
A primary knowledge about Fluorapatite vs Euclase luster is useful in apparent identifications of these gemstones. Luster is the measure of light that gets reflected when incident on a finished cut gemstone. There are two major types of lusters: Silky and Adamantine. Since luster varies between two crystals of even the same gemstone, luster is limited to basic identification criteria. Fluorapatite exhibits Resinous and Vitreous luster. Euclase, on other hand, exhibits Vitreous luster.