Garnet Malaia Vs Petalite
Origin
Madagascar, Tanzania
Canada, USA, Brazil, Italy, Mozambique, Zimbabwe, Russia, Burma, Australia
Color
White, Colorless, Blue, Red, Green, Yellow, Violet
Colorless, gray, Yellow, White
Streak
Not Available
Colorless
For which Rashi?
Not Available
Not Available
Planet
Not Available
Not Available
Element of Planets
Not Available
Not Available
Finger
Not Available
Not Available
Ring Metal
Not Available
Not Available
Energy
Not Available
Not Available
Deities
Not Available
Not Available
Not to wear with
Not Available
Not Available
Powers
Not Available
Not Available
Planetary
Not Available
Not Available
Talisman
Not Available
Not Available
Tenacity
Not Available
Brittle
Solubility
Not Available
insoluble
Durability
Not Available
Not Available
Specific Gravity
Not Available
2.40
Fracture
Not Available
Subconchoidal, ConchoidalWalter Schumann, Gemstones of the world (2001) More from other references, Brittle, Conchoidal
Cleavage
Not Available
Perfect on {001}, poor on {201} with 38.5° angle between the two
Mohs Hardness
7-7.5
6-6.5
Chemical Composition
Not Available
LiAlSi 4O 10Michael OâDonoghue , Gems, Sixth Edition (2006) More from other references
Luster
Not Available
Vitreous, Pearly
Pleochroism
Not Available
AbsentWalter Schumann
Transparency
Not Available
Gemmological Tables (2004) More from other references
Refractive Index
1.73-1.81
1.502-1.523
Optic Character
Not Available
Not Available
Crystal System
Isometric
monoclinic
Birefringence
Not Available
0.012-0.016
Clarity
Color grading system
TransparentUlrich Henn and Claudio C. Milisenda
Neurological
Not Available
Not Available
Cardiovascular
Not Available
Not Available
Respiratory
Not Available
Not Available
Reproductive
Not Available
Not Available
Digestive
Not Available
Not Available
Psychology
Not Available
Not Available
Healing
Not Available
Not Available
Qualities Associated
Not Available
Not Available
Garnet Malaia Vs Petalite Fracture
Fracture is an important parameter when you compare Garnet Malaia and Petalite Physical Properties. It is necessary to understand the significance of these properties, before you compare Garnet Malaia Vs Petalite fracture. Whenever a gemstone chip breaks, it leaves a characteristic line along its breakage. Such lines are known as fracture and are used to identify the gemstones in their initial stages of production when they are in the form of rough minerals. Fracture is usually described with the terms “fibrous” and “splintery” to denote a fracture that usually leaves elongated and sharp edges. Petalite fracture is Brittle, Conchoidal, ConchoidalWalter Schumann, Gemstones of the world (2001) More from other references and Subconchoidal.
Garnet Malaia Vs Petalite Luster
A primary knowledge about Garnet Malaia vs Petalite luster is useful in apparent identifications of these gemstones. Luster is the measure of light that gets reflected when incident on a finished cut gemstone. There are two major types of lusters: Silky and Adamantine. Since luster varies between two crystals of even the same gemstone, luster is limited to basic identification criteria. Petalite, on other hand, exhibits Pearly and Vitreous luster.