Origin
Tanzania, Madagascar, Kenya, Sri Lanka, Burma, Australia
USA, Brazyl, Austria, Italy, Tanzania, Pakistan, Russia, Sri Lanka, Burma, Color: green, yellow-green, Not Available, Hardness: 5.5 6, Refractive index: 1.66 1.71, Density: 3.25 3.55, Chemical composition: CaMg(Si2O6), Crystal structure: monoclinic, Origins: USA
Color
Green, Brown, Colorless, Greenish, Yellow
Yellow, Colorless, Brown, Blue, Green, gray
Streak
White
White, Green
For which Rashi?
Not Available
Not Available
Planet
Not Available
Not Available
Element of Planets
Not Available
Not Available
Energy
Not Available
Not Available
Finger
Not Available
Not Available
Ring Metal
Not Available
Not Available
Deities
Not Available
Not Available
Not to wear with
Not Available
Not Available
Powers
Not Available
Not Available
Planetary
Not Available
Not Available
Talisman
Not Available
Not Available
Tenacity
Not Available
Brittle
Solubility
Not Available
Not Available
Durability
Not Available
Not Available
Specific Gravity
3.25-3.45
3.22-3.40
Fracture
ConchoidalArthur Thomas, Gemstones (2009), Brittle, Uneven
Conchoidal, UnevenWalter Schumann, Gemstones of the world (2001) More from other references, Brittle
Cleavage
Good on {110}
Distinct/good on {110}
Chemical Composition
Mg 3Al 6(Si,Al,B) 5O 21(OH)Walter Schumann , Gemstones of the world (2001) More from other references
CaMgSi2O6
Pleochroism
X = colorless to green; Y = colorless
Not Available
Transparency
Gemmological Tables (2004) More from other references
Transparent, Translucent, Not Available, Transparent . Star Diopside is opaque .
Refractive Index
1.660-1.685
1.664-1.730
Optic Character
Not Available
Not Available
Crystal System
Orthorhombic
monoclinic
Birefringence
0.012-0.017
0.024-0.030
Clarity
TransparentUlrich Henn and Claudio C. Milisenda
Transparent
Neurological
Not Available
Not Available
Cardiovascular
Not Available
Not Available
Respiratory
Not Available
Not Available
Reproductive
Not Available
Not Available
Digestive
Not Available
Not Available
Psychology
Not Available
Not Available
Healing
Not Available
Not Available
Qualities Associated
Not Available
Not Available
Kornerupine Vs Diopside Fracture
Fracture is an important parameter when you compare Kornerupine and Diopside Physical Properties. It is necessary to understand the significance of these properties, before you compare Kornerupine Vs Diopside fracture. Whenever a gemstone chip breaks, it leaves a characteristic line along its breakage. Such lines are known as fracture and are used to identify the gemstones in their initial stages of production when they are in the form of rough minerals. Fracture is usually described with the terms “fibrous” and “splintery” to denote a fracture that usually leaves elongated and sharp edges. Fracture observed in Kornerupine is ConchoidalArthur Thomas, Gemstones (2009), Brittle and Uneven. Diopside fracture is Conchoidal, UnevenWalter Schumann, Gemstones of the world (2001) More from other references and Brittle.
Kornerupine Vs Diopside Luster
A primary knowledge about Kornerupine vs Diopside luster is useful in apparent identifications of these gemstones. Luster is the measure of light that gets reflected when incident on a finished cut gemstone. There are two major types of lusters: Silky and Adamantine. Since luster varies between two crystals of even the same gemstone, luster is limited to basic identification criteria. Kornerupine exhibits Vitreous luster. Diopside, on other hand, exhibits Vitreous luster.