Kornerupine Vs Orthoclase
Origin
Tanzania, Madagascar, Kenya, Sri Lanka, Burma, Australia
  
Russia
  
Color
Green, Brown, Colorless, Greenish, Yellow
  
Colorless, Colorless, Greenish, Yellow, White, pink
  
Streak
White
  
White
  
For which Rashi?
Not Available
  
Not Available
  
Planet
Not Available
  
Not Available
  
Element of Planets
Not Available
  
Not Available
  
How to Wear?
  
  
Finger
Not Available
  
Not Available
  
Ring Metal
Not Available
  
Not Available
  
Energy
Not Available
  
Not Available
  
Deities
Not Available
  
Not Available
  
Not to wear with
Not Available
  
Not Available
  
Powers
Not Available
  
Not Available
  
Birthstone
  
  
Planetary
Not Available
  
Not Available
  
Talisman
Not Available
  
Not Available
  
Tenacity
Not Available
  
Not Available
  
Solubility
Not Available
  
Not Available
  
Durability
Not Available
  
Not Available
  
Specific Gravity
3.25-3.45
  
2.54-2.61
  
Fracture
ConchoidalArthur Thomas, Gemstones (2009), ConchoidalArthur Thomas, Gemstones (2009), Brittle, Uneven
  
Gems, Uneven
  
Cleavage
Good on {110}
  
Has perfect cleavage on {001} and good cleavage on {010}. Cleavages intersect at 90°.
  
Mohs Hardness
6.5
  
6
  
Chemical Composition
Mg 3Al 6(Si,Al,B) 5O 21(OH)Walter Schumann , Gemstones of the world (2001) More from other references
  
KAlSi 3O 8Michael OâDonoghue , Gems, Sixth Edition (2006) More from other references
  
Luster
Vitreous
  
Vitreous, Pearly
  
Pleochroism
X = colorless to green; Y = colorless
  
colorless.
  
Transparency
Gemmological Tables (2004) More from other references
  
Gemmological Tables (2004) More from other references
  
Refractive Index
1.660-1.685
  
1.518-1.536
  
Optic Character
Not Available
  
Not Available
  
Crystal System
Orthorhombic
  
monoclinic
  
Birefringence
0.012-0.017
  
0.0050-0.0060
  
Clarity
TransparentUlrich Henn and Claudio C. Milisenda
  
TransparentUlrich Henn and Claudio C. Milisenda
  
Physical
  
  
Neurological
Not Available
  
Not Available
  
Cardiovascular
Not Available
  
Not Available
  
Respiratory
Not Available
  
Not Available
  
Reproductive
Not Available
  
Not Available
  
Digestive
Not Available
  
Not Available
  
Psychology
Not Available
  
Not Available
  
Healing
Not Available
  
Not Available
  
Qualities Associated
Not Available
  
Not Available
  
Kornerupine Vs Orthoclase Fracture
Fracture is an important parameter when you compare Kornerupine and Orthoclase Physical Properties. It is necessary to understand the significance of these properties, before you compare Kornerupine Vs Orthoclase fracture. Whenever a gemstone chip breaks, it leaves a characteristic line along its breakage. Such lines are known as fracture and are used to identify the gemstones in their initial stages of production when they are in the form of rough minerals. Fracture is usually described with the terms “fibrous” and “splintery” to denote a fracture that usually leaves elongated and sharp edges. Fracture observed in Kornerupine is Brittle, ConchoidalArthur Thomas, ConchoidalArthur Thomas, Gemstones (2009), Gemstones (2009) and Uneven. Orthoclase fracture is Gems and Uneven.
Kornerupine Vs Orthoclase Luster
A primary knowledge about Kornerupine vs Orthoclase luster is useful in apparent identifications of these gemstones. Luster is the measure of light that gets reflected when incident on a finished cut gemstone. There are two major types of lusters: Silky and Adamantine. Since luster varies between two crystals of even the same gemstone, luster is limited to basic identification criteria. Kornerupine exhibits Vitreous luster. Orthoclase, on other hand, exhibits Pearly and Vitreous luster.