Serandite Vs Smithsonite
Origin
Canada
USA, Southern and central Africa
Color
Brown, pink, orange, Red
Brown, Green, White, gray, Blue, Yellow
For which Rashi?
Not Available
Not Available
Planet
Not Available
Not Available
Element of Planets
Not Available
Not Available
Energy
Not Available
Not Available
Finger
Not Available
Not Available
Ring Metal
Not Available
Not Available
Deities
Not Available
Not Available
Not to wear with
Not Available
Not Available
Powers
Not Available
Not Available
Planetary
Not Available
Not Available
Talisman
Not Available
Not Available
Tenacity
Not Available
Brittle
Solubility
Not Available
Not Available
Durability
Not Available
Not Available
Specific Gravity
3.52
4.00-4.65
Fracture
UnevenAnthony et al, Handbook of mineralogy (2001), UnevenAnthony et al, Handbook of mineralogy (2001)
Uneven, Sub-Conchoidal, UnevenWalter Schumann, Gemstones of the world (2001) More from other references, Brittle, Metallic
Cleavage
{100} Perfect, {001} Perfect
Perfect on [1011]
Mohs Hardness
5-5.5
5-5.5
Chemical Composition
Na(Mn2+ ,Ca) 2Si 3O 8(OH)Michael OâDonoghue , Gems, Sixth Edition (2006)
ZnCO 3Michael OâDonoghue , Gems, Sixth Edition (2006) More from other references
Luster
Vitreous, Silky, Greasy, Fibrous
Vitreous, Pearly
Pleochroism
Not Available
AbsentWalter Schumann
Transparency
Gemmological Tables (2004) More from other references
Translucent
Refractive Index
1.672-1.708
1.620-1.850
Optic Character
Not Available
Not Available
Crystal System
Not Available
Trigonal
Birefringence
0.036
0.223-0.227
Clarity
TransparentUlrich Henn and Claudio C. Milisenda
Translucent
Neurological
Not Available
Not Available
Cardiovascular
Not Available
Not Available
Respiratory
Not Available
Not Available
Reproductive
Not Available
Not Available
Digestive
Not Available
Not Available
Psychology
Not Available
Not Available
Healing
Not Available
Not Available
Qualities Associated
Not Available
Not Available
Serandite Vs Smithsonite Fracture
Fracture is an important parameter when you compare Serandite and Smithsonite Physical Properties. It is necessary to understand the significance of these properties, before you compare Serandite Vs Smithsonite fracture. Whenever a gemstone chip breaks, it leaves a characteristic line along its breakage. Such lines are known as fracture and are used to identify the gemstones in their initial stages of production when they are in the form of rough minerals. Fracture is usually described with the terms “fibrous” and “splintery” to denote a fracture that usually leaves elongated and sharp edges. Fracture observed in Serandite is UnevenAnthony et al, Handbook of mineralogy (2001), UnevenAnthony et al and Handbook of mineralogy (2001). Smithsonite fracture is Uneven, Sub-Conchoidal, UnevenWalter Schumann, Gemstones of the world (2001) More from other references, Brittle and Metallic.
Serandite Vs Smithsonite Luster
A primary knowledge about Serandite vs Smithsonite luster is useful in apparent identifications of these gemstones. Luster is the measure of light that gets reflected when incident on a finished cut gemstone. There are two major types of lusters: Silky and Adamantine. Since luster varies between two crystals of even the same gemstone, luster is limited to basic identification criteria. Serandite exhibits Vitreous, Silky, Greasy and Fibrous luster. Smithsonite, on other hand, exhibits Vitreous and Pearly luster.
