Smithsonite Vs Azurmalachite
Origin
USA, Southern and central Africa
Not Available, Southern and central Africa
Color
Brown, Green, White, gray, Blue, Yellow
Blue
Streak
White
Not Available
For which Rashi?
Not Available
Capricorn, Scorpio
Planet
Not Available
Venus
Element of Planets
Not Available
Earth
Finger
Not Available
Not Available
Ring Metal
Not Available
Not Available
Energy
Not Available
Receptive
Deities
Not Available
Freyja
Not to wear with
Not Available
Not Available
Powers
Not Available
Protection
Planetary
Not Available
Not Available
Talisman
Not Available
Not Available
Tenacity
Brittle
Not Available
Solubility
Not Available
Not Available
Durability
Not Available
Not Available
Specific Gravity
4.00-4.65
3.70-3.95
Fracture
Uneven, Sub-Conchoidal, UnevenWalter Schumann, Gemstones of the world (2001) More from other references, Brittle, Metallic
ConchoidalGemdat.org, Management Team (2012), ConchoidalGemdat.org, Management Team (2012)
Cleavage
Perfect on [1011]
1,1 basal.
Mohs Hardness
5-5.5
3.5-4
Chemical Composition
ZnCO 3Michael OâDonoghue , Gems, Sixth Edition (2006) More from other references
(Cu) 3(OH) 2(CO 3) 2 + Cu 2(CO 3)(OH) 2Gemdat.org , Management Team (2012)
Luster
Vitreous, Pearly
Vitreous, Silky
Pleochroism
AbsentWalter Schumann
AbsentWalter Schumann
Transparency
Translucent
Translucent
Refractive Index
1.620-1.850
1.655-1.909
Optic Character
Not Available
Biaxial/+
Crystal System
Trigonal
monoclinic
Birefringence
0.223-0.227
0.108-0.254
Clarity
Translucent
Translucent
Neurological
Not Available
Not Available
Cardiovascular
Not Available
Not Available
Respiratory
Not Available
Not Available
Reproductive
Not Available
Not Available
Digestive
Not Available
Not Available
Psychology
Not Available
Not Available
Healing
Not Available
Not Available
Qualities Associated
Not Available
Not Available
Smithsonite Vs Azurmalachite Fracture
Fracture is an important parameter when you compare Smithsonite and Azurmalachite Physical Properties. It is necessary to understand the significance of these properties, before you compare Smithsonite Vs Azurmalachite fracture. Whenever a gemstone chip breaks, it leaves a characteristic line along its breakage. Such lines are known as fracture and are used to identify the gemstones in their initial stages of production when they are in the form of rough minerals. Fracture is usually described with the terms “fibrous” and “splintery” to denote a fracture that usually leaves elongated and sharp edges. Fracture observed in Smithsonite is Brittle, Gemstones of the world (2001) More from other references, Metallic, Sub-Conchoidal, Uneven and UnevenWalter Schumann. Azurmalachite fracture is ConchoidalGemdat.org, ConchoidalGemdat.org, Management Team (2012) and Management Team (2012).
Smithsonite Vs Azurmalachite Luster
A primary knowledge about Smithsonite vs Azurmalachite luster is useful in apparent identifications of these gemstones. Luster is the measure of light that gets reflected when incident on a finished cut gemstone. There are two major types of lusters: Silky and Adamantine. Since luster varies between two crystals of even the same gemstone, luster is limited to basic identification criteria. Smithsonite exhibits Pearly and Vitreous luster. Azurmalachite, on other hand, exhibits Silky and Vitreous luster.