Origin
Mozambique, Southern and central Africa
USA, Brazyl, Austria, Italy, Tanzania, Pakistan, Russia, Sri Lanka, Burma, Color: green, yellow-green, Not Available, Not Available, Not Available, Hardness: 5.5 6, Refractive index: 1.66 1.71, Density: 3.25 3.55, Chemical composition: CaMg(Si2O6), Crystal structure: monoclinic, Origins: USA, Brazyl, Austria, Italy, Tanzania, Pakistan, Russia, Sri Lanka
Color
Yellow, Reddish, Brown, Greenish
Yellow, Colorless, Brown, Blue, Brown, Colorless, Green, gray
Streak
Yellow
White, White, Green
For which Rashi?
Not Available
Not Available
Planet
Not Available
Not Available
Element of Planets
Not Available
Not Available
Finger
Not Available
Not Available
Ring Metal
Not Available
Not Available
Energy
Not Available
Not Available
Deities
Not Available
Not Available
Not to wear with
Not Available
Not Available
Powers
Not Available
Not Available
Planetary
Not Available
Not Available
Talisman
Not Available
Not Available
Tenacity
Not Available
Brittle
Solubility
Not Available
Not Available
Durability
Not Available
Not Available
Specific Gravity
Not Available
3.22-3.40
Fracture
ConchoidalAnthony et al, Handbook of mineralogy (2001), ConchoidalAnthony et al, Handbook of mineralogy (2001), Brittle, Conchoidal
Conchoidal, UnevenWalter Schumann, Gemstones of the world (2001) More from other references, Brittle, Conchoidal
Cleavage
{???} Perfect
Distinct/good on {110}
Chemical Composition
SbTaO 4Ulrich Henn and Claudio C.
CaMgSi2O6
Luster
Adamantine
Vitreous
Pleochroism
Not Available
Not Available
Transparency
Gemmological Tables (2004) More from other references
Transparent, Translucent, Not Available, Transparent . Star Diopside is opaque .
Refractive Index
2.37-2.45
1.664-1.730
Optic Character
Not Available
Not Available
Crystal System
Not Available
monoclinic
Birefringence
0.08
0.024-0.030
Clarity
TransparentUlrich Henn and Claudio C. Milisenda
Transparent
Neurological
Not Available
Not Available
Cardiovascular
Not Available
Not Available
Respiratory
Not Available
Not Available
Reproductive
Not Available
Not Available
Digestive
Not Available
Not Available
Psychology
Not Available
Not Available
Healing
Not Available
Not Available
Qualities Associated
Not Available
Not Available
Stibiotantalite Vs Diopside Fracture
Fracture is an important parameter when you compare Stibiotantalite and Diopside Physical Properties. It is necessary to understand the significance of these properties, before you compare Stibiotantalite Vs Diopside fracture. Whenever a gemstone chip breaks, it leaves a characteristic line along its breakage. Such lines are known as fracture and are used to identify the gemstones in their initial stages of production when they are in the form of rough minerals. Fracture is usually described with the terms “fibrous” and “splintery” to denote a fracture that usually leaves elongated and sharp edges. Fracture observed in Stibiotantalite is Brittle, Conchoidal, ConchoidalAnthony et al, ConchoidalAnthony et al, Handbook of mineralogy (2001) and Handbook of mineralogy (2001). Diopside fracture is Brittle, Conchoidal, Conchoidal, Gemstones of the world (2001) More from other references and UnevenWalter Schumann.
Stibiotantalite Vs Diopside Luster
A primary knowledge about Stibiotantalite vs Diopside luster is useful in apparent identifications of these gemstones. Luster is the measure of light that gets reflected when incident on a finished cut gemstone. There are two major types of lusters: Silky and Adamantine. Since luster varies between two crystals of even the same gemstone, luster is limited to basic identification criteria. Stibiotantalite exhibits Adamantine luster. Diopside, on other hand, exhibits Vitreous luster.