Xonotlite Vs Azurmalachite
Origin
Mexico
  
Not Available, Southern and central Africa
  
Color
White, Colorless, gray, pink
  
Blue
  
Streak
Colorless, White
  
Not Available
  
For which Rashi?
Not Available
  
Capricorn, Scorpio
  
Planet
Not Available
  
Venus
  
Element of Planets
Not Available
  
Earth
  
How to Wear?
  
  
Finger
Not Available
  
Not Available
  
Ring Metal
Not Available
  
Not Available
  
Energy
Not Available
  
Receptive
  
Deities
Not Available
  
Freyja
  
Not to wear with
Not Available
  
Not Available
  
Powers
Not Available
  
Protection
  
Birthstone
  
  
Planetary
Not Available
  
Not Available
  
Talisman
Not Available
  
Not Available
  
Tenacity
Not Available
  
Not Available
  
Solubility
Not Available
  
Not Available
  
Durability
Not Available
  
Not Available
  
Specific Gravity
2.71-2.72
  
3.70-3.95
  
Fracture
Handbook of mineralogy (2001), Difficult, Fibrous
  
ConchoidalGemdat.org, Management Team (2012), ConchoidalGemdat.org, Management Team (2012)
  
Cleavage
{???} Good
  
1,1 basal.
  
Mohs Hardness
6-6.5
  
3.5-4
  
Chemical Composition
Ca 6Si 6O 17(OH) 2Michael OâDonoghue , Gems, Sixth Edition (2006)
  
(Cu) 3(OH) 2(CO 3) 2 + Cu 2(CO 3)(OH) 2Gemdat.org , Management Team (2012)
  
Luster
Vitreous, Silky
  
Vitreous, Silky
  
Pleochroism
Not Available
  
AbsentWalter Schumann
  
Dispersion
Not Available
  
Not Available
  
Transparency
Gems, Sixth Edition (2006)
  
Translucent
  
Refractive Index
1.581-1.593
  
1.655-1.909
  
Optic Character
Not Available
  
Biaxial/+
  
Crystal System
monoclinic
  
monoclinic
  
Birefringence
0.010
  
0.108-0.254
  
Clarity
Gems
  
Translucent
  
Physical
  
  
Neurological
Not Available
  
Not Available
  
Cardiovascular
Not Available
  
Not Available
  
Respiratory
Not Available
  
Not Available
  
Reproductive
Not Available
  
Not Available
  
Digestive
Not Available
  
Not Available
  
Psychology
Not Available
  
Not Available
  
Healing
Not Available
  
Not Available
  
Qualities Associated
Not Available
  
Not Available
  
Xonotlite Vs Azurmalachite Fracture
Fracture is an important parameter when you compare Xonotlite and Azurmalachite Physical Properties. It is necessary to understand the significance of these properties, before you compare Xonotlite Vs Azurmalachite fracture. Whenever a gemstone chip breaks, it leaves a characteristic line along its breakage. Such lines are known as fracture and are used to identify the gemstones in their initial stages of production when they are in the form of rough minerals. Fracture is usually described with the terms “fibrous” and “splintery” to denote a fracture that usually leaves elongated and sharp edges. Fracture observed in Xonotlite is Difficult, Fibrous and Handbook of mineralogy (2001). Azurmalachite fracture is ConchoidalGemdat.org, ConchoidalGemdat.org, Management Team (2012) and Management Team (2012).
Xonotlite Vs Azurmalachite Luster
A primary knowledge about Xonotlite vs Azurmalachite luster is useful in apparent identifications of these gemstones. Luster is the measure of light that gets reflected when incident on a finished cut gemstone. There are two major types of lusters: Silky and Adamantine. Since luster varies between two crystals of even the same gemstone, luster is limited to basic identification criteria. Xonotlite exhibits Silky and Vitreous luster. Azurmalachite, on other hand, exhibits Silky and Vitreous luster.