×

Chrysoprase
Chrysoprase

Mellite
Mellite



ADD
Compare
X
Chrysoprase
X
Mellite

Chrysoprase Vs Mellite

1 Astrology
1.1 Origin
Southern and central Africa, USA, Australia, Brazil, USA, Australia, Brazil, USA
Southern and central Africa
1.2 Color
Green
Brown, Brownish, White, Colorless, Yellow
1.3 Streak
Not Available
White
1.4 For which Rashi?
Cancer, Taurus, Cancer, Taurus, Cancer, Taurus
Not Available
1.5 Planet
Venus
Not Available
1.6 Element of Planets
Earth
Not Available
1.7 How to Wear?
1.7.1 Finger
Not Available
Not Available
1.7.2 Ring Metal
Not Available
Not Available
1.8 Energy
Receptive
Not Available
1.9 Deities
Vesta
Not Available
1.10 Not to wear with
Not Available
Not Available
1.11 Powers
Protection, Healing
Not Available
1.12 Birthstone
1.12.1 Planetary
Not Available
Not Available
1.12.2 Talisman
Not Available
Not Available
2 Physical Properties
2.1 Tenacity
Not Available
Not Available
2.2 Solubility
Not Available
Not Available
2.3 Durability
Not Available
Not Available
2.4 Specific Gravity
2.58-2.641.58-1.60
Amber
1 7.18
2.5 Fracture
Gems, Sixth Edition (2006)
ConchoidalAnthony et al, Handbook of mineralogy (2001), ConchoidalAnthony et al, Handbook of mineralogy (2001), Conchoidal, Brittle
2.6 Cleavage
None
{011} Imperfect
2.7 Mohs Hardness
6.5-72
Amber
2 10
2.8 Chemical Composition
SiO2 (with a high level of nickel impurities )
Al 2(Cl 2O 12) · 18H 2OUlrich Henn and Claudio C.
3 Optical Properties
3.1 Luster
Vitreous, Vitreous, Waxy
Vitreous
3.2 Pleochroism
AbsentWalter Schumann
Weak: yellowish brown yellowAnthony et al
3.3 Dispersion
NoneNA
Fluorite
0.007 1
3.4 Transparency
Translucent, Translucent, Opaque, Translucent to nearly opaque
Gemmological Tables (2004) More from other references
3.5 Refractive Index
1.530-1.5431.509-1.541
Agate Opal
1 3.25
3.6 Optic Character
Not Available
Not Available
3.7 Crystal System
Trigonal
Not Available
3.8 Birefringence
0.0040.030
Achroite
0 0.296
3.9 Clarity
Translucent
TransparentUlrich Henn and Claudio C. Milisenda
4 Benefits
4.1 Physical
4.1.1 Neurological
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.2 Cardiovascular
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.3 Respiratory
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.4 Reproductive
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.5 Digestive
Not Available
Not Available
4.2 Psychology
Not Available
Not Available
4.3 Healing
Not Available
Not Available
4.4 Qualities Associated
Not Available
Not Available

Chrysoprase Vs Mellite Fracture

Fracture is an important parameter when you compare Chrysoprase and Mellite Physical Properties. It is necessary to understand the significance of these properties, before you compare Chrysoprase Vs Mellite fracture. Whenever a gemstone chip breaks, it leaves a characteristic line along its breakage. Such lines are known as fracture and are used to identify the gemstones in their initial stages of production when they are in the form of rough minerals. Fracture is usually described with the terms “fibrous” and “splintery” to denote a fracture that usually leaves elongated and sharp edges. Fracture observed in Chrysoprase is Gems and Sixth Edition (2006). Mellite fracture is Brittle, Conchoidal, ConchoidalAnthony et al, ConchoidalAnthony et al, Handbook of mineralogy (2001) and Handbook of mineralogy (2001).

Chrysoprase Vs Mellite Luster

A primary knowledge about Chrysoprase vs Mellite luster is useful in apparent identifications of these gemstones. Luster is the measure of light that gets reflected when incident on a finished cut gemstone. There are two major types of lusters: Silky and Adamantine. Since luster varies between two crystals of even the same gemstone, luster is limited to basic identification criteria. Chrysoprase exhibits Vitreous, Vitreous and Waxy luster. Mellite, on other hand, exhibits Vitreous luster.