×

Amber
Amber

Catapleiite
Catapleiite



ADD
Compare
X
Amber
X
Catapleiite

Amber Vs Catapleiite

Add ⊕
1 Astrology
1.1 Origin
India
Not Available, Southern and central Africa
1.2 Color
White, Red, Green, Blue, Brown, Yellow, Brown, Black, pink, Blue, Green, Yellow, Brown, Yellow, Brown, orange
Blue, Brown, Colorless, Yellow, Blue, Brown, Colorless, Yellow
1.3 Streak
White
White
1.4 For which Rashi?
Leo
Not Available
1.5 Planet
Sun
Not Available
1.6 Element of Planets
Earth, Air, Water
Not Available
1.7 How to Wear?
1.7.1 Finger
Not Available
Not Available
1.7.2 Ring Metal
Not Available
Not Available
1.8 Energy
Projective
Not Available
1.9 Deities
Freyja
Not Available
1.10 Not to wear with
Not Available
Not Available
1.11 Powers
Healing, Protection, Love
Not Available
1.12 Birthstone
1.12.1 Planetary
Not Available
Not Available
1.12.2 Talisman
Not Available
Not Available
2 Physical Properties
2.1 Tenacity
Not Available
Not Available
2.2 Solubility
Soluble
Not Available
2.3 Durability
Not Available
Not Available
2.4 Specific Gravity
1.05-1.102.72
Achroite
1 7.18
2.5 Fracture
ConchoidalArthur Thomas, Gemstones (2009), Conchoidal, Brittle, ConchoidalArthur Thomas, Gemstones (2009), Conchoidal, Brittle
Brittle, Metallic, Brittle, Metallic
2.6 Cleavage
None
{110} Perfect, {010} Perfect
2.7 Mohs Hardness
2-2.55-6
Adamite
2 10
2.8 Chemical Composition
[C,H,O]
Na 2ZrSi 3O 9 · 2H 2OMichael O’Donoghue , Gems, Sixth Edition (2006)
3 Optical Properties
3.1 Luster
Resinous
Vitreous
3.2 Pleochroism
AbsentWalter Schumann
Not Available
3.3 Dispersion
NANA
Fluorite
0.007 1
3.4 Transparency
Transparent, Translucent
TransparentUlrich Henn and Claudio C. Milisenda, Gemmological Tables (2004)
3.5 Refractive Index
1.539-1.5451.590-1.629
Agate Opal
1 3.25
3.6 Optic Character
Not Available
Not Available
3.7 Crystal System
Amorphous
Monoclinic Prismatic H-M Symbol (2/m) Space Group: B2/b (pseudo-HEX)
3.8 Birefringence
Not Available0.039
Achroite
0 0.296
3.9 Clarity
Transparent
TransparentUlrich Henn and Claudio C. Milisenda
4 Benefits
4.1 Physical
4.1.1 Neurological
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.2 Cardiovascular
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.3 Respiratory
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.4 Reproductive
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.5 Digestive
Not Available
Not Available
4.2 Psychology
Not Available
Not Available
4.3 Healing
Not Available
Not Available
4.4 Qualities Associated
Not Available
Not Available

Amber Vs Catapleiite Fracture

Fracture is an important parameter when you compare Amber and Catapleiite Physical Properties. It is necessary to understand the significance of these properties, before you compare Amber Vs Catapleiite fracture. Whenever a gemstone chip breaks, it leaves a characteristic line along its breakage. Such lines are known as fracture and are used to identify the gemstones in their initial stages of production when they are in the form of rough minerals. Fracture is usually described with the terms “fibrous” and “splintery” to denote a fracture that usually leaves elongated and sharp edges. Fracture observed in Amber is Brittle, Brittle, Conchoidal, Conchoidal, ConchoidalArthur Thomas, ConchoidalArthur Thomas, Gemstones (2009) and Gemstones (2009). Catapleiite fracture is Brittle, Brittle, Metallic and Metallic.

Amber Vs Catapleiite Luster

A primary knowledge about Amber vs Catapleiite luster is useful in apparent identifications of these gemstones. Luster is the measure of light that gets reflected when incident on a finished cut gemstone. There are two major types of lusters: Silky and Adamantine. Since luster varies between two crystals of even the same gemstone, luster is limited to basic identification criteria. Amber exhibits Resinous luster. Catapleiite, on other hand, exhibits Vitreous luster.