Origin
Mexico, USA, Canada, Madagascar, Spain, Russia, Sri Lanka, India, Burma, Color: green, greenish yellow, blue, violet, Hardness: 5, Refractive index: 1.60 1.67, Density: 3.17 3.35, Chemical composition: Phosphate composition, Crystal structure: hexagonal, Lustre: vitreous, Origins: Mexico, USA, Canada, Madagascar, Spain, Russia, Sri Lanka, India, brown, green, Yellow, violet, brown, green, Yellow, violet
Not Available, blue
Color
Yellow, Green, Blue, Blue, Green, White, Yellow, Green, Red, Blue, Green, Colorless, Yellow, Blue, Violet, pink, Brown
Blue, Blue, Green, Blue, Blue
For which Rashi?
Gemini
Sagittarius, Capricorn, Sagittarius, Capricorn, Sagittarius, Capricorn
Element of Planets
Earth
Water
Finger
Not Available
Not Available
Ring Metal
Not Available
Not Available
Energy
Projective
Receptive
Deities
Jupiter/Neptune
Goddess
Not to wear with
Not Available
Not Available
Powers
Healing
Psychic Power
Planetary
Not Available
Not Available
Talisman
Not Available
Not Available
Tenacity
Not Available
Brittle
Solubility
Not Available
Not Available
Durability
Not Available
Not Available
Specific Gravity
3.16-3.23
3.70-3.90
Fracture
Conchoidal, Uneven, Conchoidal, Brittle, ConchoidalArthur Thomas, Gemstones (2009), Conchoidal to uneven
Conchoidal, ConchoidalArthur Thomas, Gemstones (2009), Brittle, Conchoidal
Cleavage
[0001] indistinct, [1010] indistinct
Perfect on {011}, fair on {100}, poor on {110}
Chemical Composition
Ca 5(PO 4) 3(F,OH,Cl)Walter Schumann , Gemstones of the world (2001) More from other references
Cu 3(OH) 2(CO 3) 2Michael OâDonoghue , Gems, Sixth Edition (2006) More from other references
Pleochroism
Blue stones – strong
Visible shades of blue
Transparency
Gemmological Tables (2004) More from other references
Transparent, Translucent
Refractive Index
1.628-1.651
1.720-1.850
Optic Character
Not Available
Not Available
Crystal System
Hexagonal
monoclinic
Birefringence
0.002-0.008
0.108
Clarity
TransparentUlrich Henn and Claudio C. Milisenda
Transparent
Neurological
Not Available
Not Available
Cardiovascular
Not Available
Not Available
Respiratory
Not Available
Not Available
Reproductive
Not Available
Not Available
Digestive
Not Available
Not Available
Psychology
Not Available
Not Available
Healing
Not Available
Not Available
Qualities Associated
Not Available
Not Available
Apatite Vs Azurite Fracture
Fracture is an important parameter when you compare Apatite and Azurite Physical Properties. It is necessary to understand the significance of these properties, before you compare Apatite Vs Azurite fracture. Whenever a gemstone chip breaks, it leaves a characteristic line along its breakage. Such lines are known as fracture and are used to identify the gemstones in their initial stages of production when they are in the form of rough minerals. Fracture is usually described with the terms “fibrous” and “splintery” to denote a fracture that usually leaves elongated and sharp edges. Fracture observed in Apatite is Brittle, Conchoidal, Conchoidal, Conchoidal to uneven, ConchoidalArthur Thomas, Gemstones (2009) and Uneven. Azurite fracture is Brittle, Conchoidal, Conchoidal, ConchoidalArthur Thomas and Gemstones (2009).
Apatite Vs Azurite Luster
A primary knowledge about Apatite vs Azurite luster is useful in apparent identifications of these gemstones. Luster is the measure of light that gets reflected when incident on a finished cut gemstone. There are two major types of lusters: Silky and Adamantine. Since luster varies between two crystals of even the same gemstone, luster is limited to basic identification criteria. Apatite exhibits Vitreous luster. Azurite, on other hand, exhibits Vitreous luster.