Origin
Mexico, USA, Canada, Madagascar, Spain, Russia, Sri Lanka, India, Burma, Color: green, greenish yellow, blue, violet, Hardness: 5, Refractive index: 1.60 1.67, Density: 3.17 3.35, Chemical composition: Phosphate composition, Crystal structure: hexagonal, Lustre: vitreous, Origins: Mexico, brown, green, Yellow
Southern and central Africa, Sixth Edition (2006)
Color
Yellow, Green, Blue, White, Red, Colorless, Violet, pink, Brown
Blue, Green, Brown
Streak
White
White, Blue, Green
For which Rashi?
Gemini
Taurus
Element of Planets
Earth
Water
Energy
Projective
Receptive
Finger
Not Available
Not Available
Ring Metal
Not Available
Not Available
Deities
Jupiter/Neptune
Venus
Not to wear with
Not Available
Not Available
Planetary
Not Available
Not Available
Talisman
Not Available
Not Available
Tenacity
Not Available
Brittle
Solubility
Not Available
Not Available
Durability
Not Available
Not Available
Specific Gravity
3.16-3.23
2.00-2.45
Fracture
Conchoidal, Uneven, Brittle, ConchoidalArthur Thomas, Gemstones (2009), Conchoidal to uneven
Sub-Conchoidal, ConchoidalArthur Thomas, Gemstones (2009), Brittle
Cleavage
[0001] indistinct, [1010] indistinct
none
Chemical Composition
Ca 5(PO 4) 3(F,OH,Cl)Walter Schumann , Gemstones of the world (2001) More from other references
Cu2H2Si2O5(OH)4
Luster
Vitreous
Vitreous, Greasy
Pleochroism
Blue stones – strong
AbsentWalter Schumann
Transparency
Gemmological Tables (2004) More from other references
Opaque
Refractive Index
1.628-1.651
1.460-1.570
Optic Character
Not Available
Not Available
Crystal System
Hexagonal
monoclinic
Birefringence
0.002-0.008
0.023-0.050
Clarity
TransparentUlrich Henn and Claudio C. Milisenda
Gemmological Tables (2004) More from other references
Neurological
Not Available
Not Available
Cardiovascular
Not Available
Not Available
Respiratory
Not Available
Not Available
Reproductive
Not Available
Not Available
Digestive
Not Available
Not Available
Psychology
Not Available
Not Available
Healing
Not Available
Not Available
Qualities Associated
Not Available
Not Available
Apatite Vs Chrysocolla Fracture
Fracture is an important parameter when you compare Apatite and Chrysocolla Physical Properties. It is necessary to understand the significance of these properties, before you compare Apatite Vs Chrysocolla fracture. Whenever a gemstone chip breaks, it leaves a characteristic line along its breakage. Such lines are known as fracture and are used to identify the gemstones in their initial stages of production when they are in the form of rough minerals. Fracture is usually described with the terms “fibrous” and “splintery” to denote a fracture that usually leaves elongated and sharp edges. Fracture observed in Apatite is Conchoidal, Uneven, Brittle, ConchoidalArthur Thomas, Gemstones (2009) and Conchoidal to uneven. Chrysocolla fracture is Sub-Conchoidal, ConchoidalArthur Thomas, Gemstones (2009) and Brittle.
Apatite Vs Chrysocolla Luster
A primary knowledge about Apatite vs Chrysocolla luster is useful in apparent identifications of these gemstones. Luster is the measure of light that gets reflected when incident on a finished cut gemstone. There are two major types of lusters: Silky and Adamantine. Since luster varies between two crystals of even the same gemstone, luster is limited to basic identification criteria. Apatite exhibits Vitreous luster. Chrysocolla, on other hand, exhibits Vitreous and Greasy luster.