Origin
Southern and central Africa, Sixth Edition (2006)
Mexico, USA, Canada, Madagascar, Spain, Russia, Sri Lanka, India, Burma, Color: green, greenish yellow, blue, violet, Hardness: 5, Refractive index: 1.60 1.67, Density: 3.17 3.35, Chemical composition: Phosphate composition, Crystal structure: hexagonal, Lustre: vitreous, Origins: Mexico, USA, Canada, Madagascar, Spain, Russia, Sri Lanka, India, brown, green, Yellow, violet, brown, green, Yellow, violet
Color
Blue, Green, Blue, Brown
Yellow, Green, Blue, Blue, Green, White, Yellow, Green, Red, Blue, Green, Colorless, Yellow, Blue, Violet, pink, Brown
Streak
White, Blue, Green
White
For which Rashi?
Taurus
Gemini
Element of Planets
Water
Earth
Finger
Not Available
Not Available
Ring Metal
Not Available
Not Available
Energy
Receptive
Projective
Deities
Venus
Jupiter/Neptune
Not to wear with
Not Available
Not Available
Planetary
Not Available
Not Available
Talisman
Not Available
Not Available
Tenacity
Brittle
Not Available
Solubility
Not Available
Not Available
Durability
Not Available
Not Available
Specific Gravity
2.00-2.45
3.16-3.23
Fracture
Sub-Conchoidal, ConchoidalArthur Thomas, Gemstones (2009), Brittle
Conchoidal, Uneven, Conchoidal, Brittle, ConchoidalArthur Thomas, Gemstones (2009), Conchoidal to uneven
Cleavage
none
[0001] indistinct, [1010] indistinct
Chemical Composition
Cu2H2Si2O5(OH)4
Ca 5(PO 4) 3(F,OH,Cl)Walter Schumann , Gemstones of the world (2001) More from other references
Luster
Vitreous, Greasy
Vitreous
Pleochroism
AbsentWalter Schumann
Blue stones – strong
Transparency
Opaque
Gemmological Tables (2004) More from other references
Refractive Index
1.460-1.570
1.628-1.651
Optic Character
Not Available
Not Available
Crystal System
monoclinic
Hexagonal
Birefringence
0.023-0.050
0.002-0.008
Clarity
Gemmological Tables (2004) More from other references
TransparentUlrich Henn and Claudio C. Milisenda
Neurological
Not Available
Not Available
Cardiovascular
Not Available
Not Available
Respiratory
Not Available
Not Available
Reproductive
Not Available
Not Available
Digestive
Not Available
Not Available
Psychology
Not Available
Not Available
Healing
Not Available
Not Available
Qualities Associated
Not Available
Not Available
Chrysocolla Vs Apatite Fracture
Fracture is an important parameter when you compare Chrysocolla and Apatite Physical Properties. It is necessary to understand the significance of these properties, before you compare Chrysocolla Vs Apatite fracture. Whenever a gemstone chip breaks, it leaves a characteristic line along its breakage. Such lines are known as fracture and are used to identify the gemstones in their initial stages of production when they are in the form of rough minerals. Fracture is usually described with the terms “fibrous” and “splintery” to denote a fracture that usually leaves elongated and sharp edges. Fracture observed in Chrysocolla is Brittle, ConchoidalArthur Thomas, Gemstones (2009) and Sub-Conchoidal. Apatite fracture is Brittle, Conchoidal, Conchoidal, Conchoidal to uneven, ConchoidalArthur Thomas, Gemstones (2009) and Uneven.
Chrysocolla Vs Apatite Luster
A primary knowledge about Chrysocolla vs Apatite luster is useful in apparent identifications of these gemstones. Luster is the measure of light that gets reflected when incident on a finished cut gemstone. There are two major types of lusters: Silky and Adamantine. Since luster varies between two crystals of even the same gemstone, luster is limited to basic identification criteria. Chrysocolla exhibits Greasy and Vitreous luster. Apatite, on other hand, exhibits Vitreous luster.