×

Atacamite
Atacamite

Ludlamite
Ludlamite



ADD
Compare
X
Atacamite
X
Ludlamite

Atacamite Vs Ludlamite

1 Astrology
1.1 Origin
Not Available
USA
1.2 Color
Green, Green, Yellow, Black
Green, Colorless, Greenish, White
1.3 Streak
Green
Greenish, White
1.4 For which Rashi?
Not Available
Not Available
1.5 Planet
Not Available
Not Available
1.6 Element of Planets
Not Available
Not Available
1.7 How to Wear?
1.7.1 Finger
Not Available
Not Available
1.7.2 Ring Metal
Not Available
Not Available
1.8 Energy
Not Available
Not Available
1.9 Deities
Not Available
Not Available
1.10 Not to wear with
Not Available
Not Available
1.11 Powers
Not Available
Not Available
1.12 Birthstone
1.12.1 Planetary
Not Available
Not Available
1.12.2 Talisman
Not Available
Not Available
2 Physical Properties
2.1 Tenacity
Brittle
Not Available
2.2 Solubility
Not Available
Not Available
2.3 Durability
Not Available
Not Available
2.4 Specific Gravity
3.745-3.7763.1-3.2
Amber
1 7.18
2.5 Fracture
Conchoidal, Conchoidal, Brittle
UnevenArthur Thomas, Gemstones (2009), UnevenArthur Thomas, Gemstones (2009)
2.6 Cleavage
Perfect on {010}, fair on {101}
Vitreous, pearly on cleavage
2.7 Mohs Hardness
3-3.53-4
Amber
2 10
2.8 Chemical Composition
Cu2Cl(OH)3
(Fe2+ ,Mg,Mn2+ ) 3(PO 4) 2 · 4H 2OMichael O’Donoghue , Gems, Sixth Edition (2006) More from other references
3 Optical Properties
3.1 Luster
Adamantine, Vitreous
Vitreous, Pearly
3.2 Pleochroism
X = pale green; Y = yellow-green; Z = grass-green
NilArthur Thomas
3.3 Dispersion
NANA
Fluorite
0.007 1
3.4 Transparency
Not Available
Gemmological Tables (2004) More from other references
3.5 Refractive Index
1.8311.653-1.693
Agate Opal
1 3.25
3.6 Optic Character
Not Available
Not Available
3.7 Crystal System
Orthorhombic
monoclinic
3.8 Birefringence
0.0490.038-0.044
Achroite
0 0.296
3.9 Clarity
Not Available
TransparentUlrich Henn and Claudio C. Milisenda
4 Benefits
4.1 Physical
4.1.1 Neurological
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.2 Cardiovascular
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.3 Respiratory
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.4 Reproductive
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.5 Digestive
Not Available
Not Available
4.2 Psychology
Not Available
Not Available
4.3 Healing
Not Available
Not Available
4.4 Qualities Associated
Not Available
Not Available

Atacamite Vs Ludlamite Fracture

Fracture is an important parameter when you compare Atacamite and Ludlamite Physical Properties. It is necessary to understand the significance of these properties, before you compare Atacamite Vs Ludlamite fracture. Whenever a gemstone chip breaks, it leaves a characteristic line along its breakage. Such lines are known as fracture and are used to identify the gemstones in their initial stages of production when they are in the form of rough minerals. Fracture is usually described with the terms “fibrous” and “splintery” to denote a fracture that usually leaves elongated and sharp edges. Fracture observed in Atacamite is Brittle, Conchoidal and Conchoidal. Ludlamite fracture is Gemstones (2009), Gemstones (2009), UnevenArthur Thomas and UnevenArthur Thomas.

Atacamite Vs Ludlamite Luster

A primary knowledge about Atacamite vs Ludlamite luster is useful in apparent identifications of these gemstones. Luster is the measure of light that gets reflected when incident on a finished cut gemstone. There are two major types of lusters: Silky and Adamantine. Since luster varies between two crystals of even the same gemstone, luster is limited to basic identification criteria. Atacamite exhibits Adamantine and Vitreous luster. Ludlamite, on other hand, exhibits Pearly and Vitreous luster.