×

Azurmalachite
Azurmalachite

Actinolite
Actinolite



ADD
Compare
X
Azurmalachite
X
Actinolite

Azurmalachite Vs Actinolite

1 Astrology
1.1 Origin
Not Available, Southern and central Africa
Not Available, Southern and central Africa
1.2 Color
Blue
Green, Black, White, Grey, Green, Black, White, Grey, Green, Black, gray, Black, Green, Black, gray, Black
1.3 Streak
Not Available
White
1.4 For which Rashi?
Capricorn, Scorpio
Not Available
1.5 Planet
Venus
Not Available
1.6 Element of Planets
Earth
Not Available
1.7 How to Wear?
1.7.1 Finger
Not Available
Not Available
1.7.2 Ring Metal
Not Available
Not Available
1.8 Energy
Receptive
Not Available
1.9 Deities
Freyja
Not Available
1.10 Not to wear with
Not Available
Not Available
1.11 Powers
Protection
Not Available
1.12 Birthstone
1.12.1 Planetary
Not Available
Not Available
1.12.2 Talisman
Not Available
Not Available
2 Physical Properties
2.1 Tenacity
Not Available
Not Available
2.2 Solubility
Not Available
Not Available
2.3 Durability
Not Available
Not Available
2.4 Specific Gravity
3.70-3.953.00
Amber
1 7.18
2.5 Fracture
ConchoidalGemdat.org, Management Team (2012), ConchoidalGemdat.org, Management Team (2012)
Uneven, UnevenArthur Thomas, Gemstones (2009), Splintery
2.6 Cleavage
1,1 basal.
perfect along {110}.
2.7 Mohs Hardness
3.5-45-6
Amber
2 10
2.8 Chemical Composition
(Cu) 3(OH) 2(CO 3) 2 + Cu 2(CO 3)(OH) 2Gemdat.org , Management Team (2012)
Ca 2(Mg,Fe) 5Si 8O 22(OH) 2Ulrich Henn and Claudio C.
3 Optical Properties
3.1 Luster
Vitreous, Silky
Vitreous
3.2 Pleochroism
AbsentWalter Schumann
moderate
3.3 Dispersion
NANA
Fluorite
0.007 1
3.4 Transparency
Translucent
TransparentUlrich Henn and Claudio C. Milisenda, Gemmological Tables (2004) More from other references
3.5 Refractive Index
1.655-1.9091.613-1.628
Agate Opal
1 3.25
3.6 Optic Character
Biaxial/+
Not Available
3.7 Crystal System
monoclinic
monoclinic
3.8 Birefringence
0.108-0.2540.0250-0.0270
Achroite
0 0.296
3.9 Clarity
Translucent
TransparentUlrich Henn and Claudio C. Milisenda
4 Benefits
4.1 Physical
4.1.1 Neurological
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.2 Cardiovascular
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.3 Respiratory
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.4 Reproductive
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.5 Digestive
Not Available
Not Available
4.2 Psychology
Not Available
Not Available
4.3 Healing
Not Available
Not Available
4.4 Qualities Associated
Not Available
Not Available

Azurmalachite Vs Actinolite Fracture

Fracture is an important parameter when you compare Azurmalachite and Actinolite Physical Properties. It is necessary to understand the significance of these properties, before you compare Azurmalachite Vs Actinolite fracture. Whenever a gemstone chip breaks, it leaves a characteristic line along its breakage. Such lines are known as fracture and are used to identify the gemstones in their initial stages of production when they are in the form of rough minerals. Fracture is usually described with the terms “fibrous” and “splintery” to denote a fracture that usually leaves elongated and sharp edges. Fracture observed in Azurmalachite is ConchoidalGemdat.org, ConchoidalGemdat.org, Management Team (2012) and Management Team (2012). Actinolite fracture is Gemstones (2009), Splintery, Uneven and UnevenArthur Thomas.

Azurmalachite Vs Actinolite Luster

A primary knowledge about Azurmalachite vs Actinolite luster is useful in apparent identifications of these gemstones. Luster is the measure of light that gets reflected when incident on a finished cut gemstone. There are two major types of lusters: Silky and Adamantine. Since luster varies between two crystals of even the same gemstone, luster is limited to basic identification criteria. Azurmalachite exhibits Silky and Vitreous luster. Actinolite, on other hand, exhibits Vitreous luster.