×

Azurmalachite
Azurmalachite

Thomsonite
Thomsonite



ADD
Compare
X
Azurmalachite
X
Thomsonite

Azurmalachite Vs Thomsonite

1 Astrology
1.1 Origin
Not Available, Southern and central Africa
India, Russia
1.2 Color
Blue
White
1.3 Streak
Not Available
White
1.4 For which Rashi?
Capricorn, Scorpio
Not Available
1.5 Planet
Venus
Not Available
1.6 Element of Planets
Earth
Not Available
1.7 How to Wear?
1.7.1 Finger
Not Available
Not Available
1.7.2 Ring Metal
Not Available
Not Available
1.8 Energy
Receptive
Not Available
1.9 Deities
Freyja
Not Available
1.10 Not to wear with
Not Available
Not Available
1.11 Powers
Protection
Not Available
1.12 Birthstone
1.12.1 Planetary
Not Available
Not Available
1.12.2 Talisman
Not Available
Not Available
2 Physical Properties
2.1 Tenacity
Not Available
Not Available
2.2 Solubility
Not Available
Not Available
2.3 Durability
Not Available
Not Available
2.4 Specific Gravity
3.70-3.952.25-2.40
Amber
1 7.18
2.5 Fracture
ConchoidalGemdat.org, Management Team (2012), ConchoidalGemdat.org, Management Team (2012)
UnevenArthur Thomas, Gemstones (2009), UnevenArthur Thomas, Gemstones (2009)
2.6 Cleavage
1,1 basal.
perfect on {010}; good on {100}
2.7 Mohs Hardness
3.5-45-5.5
Amber
2 10
2.8 Chemical Composition
(Cu) 3(OH) 2(CO 3) 2 + Cu 2(CO 3)(OH) 2Gemdat.org , Management Team (2012)
NaCa 2Al 5Si 5O 20 · 6H 2OMichael O’Donoghue , Gems, Sixth Edition (2006) More from other references
3 Optical Properties
3.1 Luster
Vitreous, Silky
Vitreous, Pearly
3.2 Pleochroism
AbsentWalter Schumann
NilArthur Thomas
3.3 Dispersion
NANA
Fluorite
0.007 1
3.4 Transparency
Translucent
Translucent
3.5 Refractive Index
1.655-1.9091.510-1.550
Agate Opal
1 3.25
3.6 Optic Character
Biaxial/+
Not Available
3.7 Crystal System
monoclinic
Orthorhombic
3.8 Birefringence
0.108-0.2540.015-0.020
Achroite
0 0.296
3.9 Clarity
Translucent
Translucent
4 Benefits
4.1 Physical
4.1.1 Neurological
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.2 Cardiovascular
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.3 Respiratory
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.4 Reproductive
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.5 Digestive
Not Available
Not Available
4.2 Psychology
Not Available
Not Available
4.3 Healing
Not Available
Not Available
4.4 Qualities Associated
Not Available
Not Available

Azurmalachite Vs Thomsonite Fracture

Fracture is an important parameter when you compare Azurmalachite and Thomsonite Physical Properties. It is necessary to understand the significance of these properties, before you compare Azurmalachite Vs Thomsonite fracture. Whenever a gemstone chip breaks, it leaves a characteristic line along its breakage. Such lines are known as fracture and are used to identify the gemstones in their initial stages of production when they are in the form of rough minerals. Fracture is usually described with the terms “fibrous” and “splintery” to denote a fracture that usually leaves elongated and sharp edges. Fracture observed in Azurmalachite is ConchoidalGemdat.org, ConchoidalGemdat.org, Management Team (2012) and Management Team (2012). Thomsonite fracture is Gemstones (2009), Gemstones (2009), UnevenArthur Thomas and UnevenArthur Thomas.

Azurmalachite Vs Thomsonite Luster

A primary knowledge about Azurmalachite vs Thomsonite luster is useful in apparent identifications of these gemstones. Luster is the measure of light that gets reflected when incident on a finished cut gemstone. There are two major types of lusters: Silky and Adamantine. Since luster varies between two crystals of even the same gemstone, luster is limited to basic identification criteria. Azurmalachite exhibits Silky and Vitreous luster. Thomsonite, on other hand, exhibits Pearly and Vitreous luster.