×

Carnelian
Carnelian

Anthophyllite
Anthophyllite



ADD
Compare
X
Carnelian
X
Anthophyllite

Carnelian Vs Anthophyllite

1 Astrology
1.1 Origin
Not Available
Not Available, Southern and central Africa
1.2 Color
Red
Brown, White, Greenish, gray, Green, Brown, Brownish, White, Greenish, gray, Green, Brown, Brownish
1.3 Streak
White
gray
1.4 For which Rashi?
Taurus, Leo, Taurus, Leo, Taurus, Leo
Not Available
1.5 Planet
Sun
Not Available
1.6 Element of Planets
Not Available
Not Available
1.7 How to Wear?
1.7.1 Finger
Not Available
Not Available
1.7.2 Ring Metal
Not Available
Not Available
1.8 Energy
Projective
Not Available
1.9 Deities
Isis, Bragi
Not Available
1.10 Not to wear with
Not Available
Not Available
1.11 Powers
Protection, Healing, Courage
Not Available
1.12 Birthstone
1.12.1 Planetary
Not Available
Not Available
1.12.2 Talisman
Not Available
Not Available
2 Physical Properties
2.1 Tenacity
Not Available
Not Available
2.2 Solubility
Not Available
Not Available
2.3 Durability
Not Available
Not Available
2.4 Specific Gravity
2.58-2.642.9-3.5
Amber
1 7.18
2.5 Fracture
Uneven, Splintery, Conchoidal, UnevenWalter Schumann, Gemstones of the world (2001)
Conchoidal, Brittle, Conchoidal, Brittle, Conchoidal, Brittle
2.6 Cleavage
Absent
{110} Perfect, {???} Distinct, {???} Distinct
2.7 Mohs Hardness
6.5-75.5-6
Amber
2 10
2.8 Chemical Composition
SiO2
(Mg,Fe2+ ) 2(Mg,Fe2+ ) 5Si 8O 22(OH) 2Anthony et al , Handbook of mineralogy (2001)
3 Optical Properties
3.1 Luster
Vitreous
Vitreous, Pearly
3.2 Pleochroism
AbsentWalter Schumann
When Fe-rich
3.3 Dispersion
NoneNA
Fluorite
0.007 1
3.4 Transparency
Translucent, Transparent to nearly opaque
Transparent
3.5 Refractive Index
1.535-1.5391.603-1.690
Agate Opal
1 3.25
3.6 Optic Character
Not Available
Biaxial/+
3.7 Crystal System
Trigonal
Orthorhombic Dipyramidal H-M Symbol (2/m 2/m 2/m) Space Group: P nma
3.8 Birefringence
0.003-0.009Not Available
Achroite
0 0.296
3.9 Clarity
Translucent
Transparent
4 Benefits
4.1 Physical
4.1.1 Neurological
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.2 Cardiovascular
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.3 Respiratory
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.4 Reproductive
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.5 Digestive
Not Available
Not Available
4.2 Psychology
Not Available
Not Available
4.3 Healing
Not Available
Not Available
4.4 Qualities Associated
Not Available
Not Available

Carnelian Vs Anthophyllite Fracture

Fracture is an important parameter when you compare Carnelian and Anthophyllite Physical Properties. It is necessary to understand the significance of these properties, before you compare Carnelian Vs Anthophyllite fracture. Whenever a gemstone chip breaks, it leaves a characteristic line along its breakage. Such lines are known as fracture and are used to identify the gemstones in their initial stages of production when they are in the form of rough minerals. Fracture is usually described with the terms “fibrous” and “splintery” to denote a fracture that usually leaves elongated and sharp edges. Fracture observed in Carnelian is Conchoidal, Gemstones of the world (2001), Splintery, Uneven and UnevenWalter Schumann. Anthophyllite fracture is Brittle, Brittle, Brittle, Conchoidal, Conchoidal and Conchoidal.

Carnelian Vs Anthophyllite Luster

A primary knowledge about Carnelian vs Anthophyllite luster is useful in apparent identifications of these gemstones. Luster is the measure of light that gets reflected when incident on a finished cut gemstone. There are two major types of lusters: Silky and Adamantine. Since luster varies between two crystals of even the same gemstone, luster is limited to basic identification criteria. Carnelian exhibits Vitreous luster. Anthophyllite, on other hand, exhibits Pearly and Vitreous luster.