×

Catapleiite
Catapleiite

Grossular
Grossular



ADD
Compare
X
Catapleiite
X
Grossular

Catapleiite Vs Grossular

1 Astrology
1.1 Origin
Not Available, Southern and central Africa
Sri Lanka, India, Brazil
1.2 Color
Blue, Brown, Colorless, Yellow, Blue, Brown, Colorless, Yellow
Green, Brown, Brown, Colorless, Green, gray, Yellow
1.3 Streak
White
Brownish, White, Brownish, White
1.4 For which Rashi?
Not Available
Not Available
1.5 Planet
Not Available
Not Available
1.6 Element of Planets
Not Available
Not Available
1.7 How to Wear?
1.7.1 Finger
Not Available
Not Available
1.7.2 Ring Metal
Not Available
Not Available
1.8 Energy
Not Available
Not Available
1.9 Deities
Not Available
Not Available
1.10 Not to wear with
Not Available
Not Available
1.11 Powers
Not Available
Not Available
1.12 Birthstone
1.12.1 Planetary
Not Available
Not Available
1.12.2 Talisman
Not Available
Not Available
2 Physical Properties
2.1 Tenacity
Not Available
Not Available
2.2 Solubility
Not Available
Not Available
2.3 Durability
Not Available
Not Available
2.4 Specific Gravity
2.723.55-3.73
Amber
1 7.18
2.5 Fracture
Brittle, Metallic, Brittle, Metallic
Conchoidal, Uneven, ConchoidalArthur Thomas, Gemstones (2009), Conchoidal, Brittle
2.6 Cleavage
{110} Perfect, {010} Perfect
none
2.7 Mohs Hardness
5-67-7.5
Amber
2 10
2.8 Chemical Composition
Na 2ZrSi 3O 9 · 2H 2OMichael O’Donoghue , Gems, Sixth Edition (2006)
Ca 3Al 2(SiO 4) 3Arthur Thomas , Gemstones (2009)
3 Optical Properties
3.1 Luster
Vitreous
Greasy, Vitreous
3.2 Pleochroism
Not Available
None
3.3 Dispersion
NA0.02
Fluorite
0.007 1
3.4 Transparency
TransparentUlrich Henn and Claudio C. Milisenda, Gemmological Tables (2004)
Gemmological Tables (2004) More from other references
3.5 Refractive Index
1.590-1.6291.730-1.760
Agate Opal
1 3.25
3.6 Optic Character
Not Available
Not Available
3.7 Crystal System
Monoclinic Prismatic H-M Symbol (2/m) Space Group: B2/b (pseudo-HEX)
cubic
3.8 Birefringence
0.0390.020
Achroite
0 0.296
3.9 Clarity
TransparentUlrich Henn and Claudio C. Milisenda
TransparentUlrich Henn and Claudio C. Milisenda
4 Benefits
4.1 Physical
4.1.1 Neurological
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.2 Cardiovascular
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.3 Respiratory
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.4 Reproductive
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.5 Digestive
Not Available
Not Available
4.2 Psychology
Not Available
Not Available
4.3 Healing
Not Available
Not Available
4.4 Qualities Associated
Not Available
Not Available

Catapleiite Vs Grossular Fracture

Fracture is an important parameter when you compare Catapleiite and Grossular Physical Properties. It is necessary to understand the significance of these properties, before you compare Catapleiite Vs Grossular fracture. Whenever a gemstone chip breaks, it leaves a characteristic line along its breakage. Such lines are known as fracture and are used to identify the gemstones in their initial stages of production when they are in the form of rough minerals. Fracture is usually described with the terms “fibrous” and “splintery” to denote a fracture that usually leaves elongated and sharp edges. Fracture observed in Catapleiite is Brittle, Brittle, Metallic and Metallic. Grossular fracture is Brittle, Conchoidal, Conchoidal, ConchoidalArthur Thomas, Gemstones (2009) and Uneven.

Catapleiite Vs Grossular Luster

A primary knowledge about Catapleiite vs Grossular luster is useful in apparent identifications of these gemstones. Luster is the measure of light that gets reflected when incident on a finished cut gemstone. There are two major types of lusters: Silky and Adamantine. Since luster varies between two crystals of even the same gemstone, luster is limited to basic identification criteria. Catapleiite exhibits Vitreous luster. Grossular, on other hand, exhibits Greasy and Vitreous luster.