×

Catapleiite
Catapleiite

Williamsite
Williamsite



ADD
Compare
X
Catapleiite
X
Williamsite

Catapleiite Vs Williamsite

1 Astrology
1.1 Origin
Not Available, Southern and central Africa
Southern and central Africa
1.2 Color
Blue, Brown, Colorless, Yellow, Blue, Brown, Colorless, Yellow
Green
1.3 Streak
White
Not Available
1.4 For which Rashi?
Not Available
Not Available
1.5 Planet
Not Available
Not Available
1.6 Element of Planets
Not Available
Not Available
1.7 How to Wear?
1.7.1 Finger
Not Available
Not Available
1.7.2 Ring Metal
Not Available
Not Available
1.8 Energy
Not Available
Not Available
1.9 Deities
Not Available
Not Available
1.10 Not to wear with
Not Available
Not Available
1.11 Powers
Not Available
Not Available
1.12 Birthstone
1.12.1 Planetary
Not Available
Not Available
1.12.2 Talisman
Not Available
Not Available
2 Physical Properties
2.1 Tenacity
Not Available
Not Available
2.2 Solubility
Not Available
Not Available
2.3 Durability
Not Available
Not Available
2.4 Specific Gravity
2.722.51-2.63
Amber
1 7.18
2.5 Fracture
Brittle, Metallic, Brittle, Metallic
Conchoidal, Conchoidal, Handbook of mineralogy (2001)
2.6 Cleavage
{110} Perfect, {010} Perfect
Not Available
2.7 Mohs Hardness
5-64
Amber
2 10
2.8 Chemical Composition
Na 2ZrSi 3O 9 · 2H 2OMichael O’Donoghue , Gems, Sixth Edition (2006)
(Mg,Fe2+ ) 3Si 2O 5(OH) 4Anthony et al , Handbook of mineralogy (2001)
3 Optical Properties
3.1 Luster
Vitreous
Waxy, Silky, Resinous, Greasy
3.2 Pleochroism
Not Available
Not Available
3.3 Dispersion
NANA
Fluorite
0.007 1
3.4 Transparency
TransparentUlrich Henn and Claudio C. Milisenda, Gemmological Tables (2004)
TranslucentHerve Nicolas Lazzarelli, Blue Chart Gem Identification (2010)
3.5 Refractive Index
1.590-1.6291.530-1.575
Agate Opal
1 3.25
3.6 Optic Character
Not Available
Not Available
3.7 Crystal System
Monoclinic Prismatic H-M Symbol (2/m) Space Group: B2/b (pseudo-HEX)
Not Available
3.8 Birefringence
0.039Not Available
Achroite
0 0.296
3.9 Clarity
TransparentUlrich Henn and Claudio C. Milisenda
TranslucentHerve Nicolas Lazzarelli
4 Benefits
4.1 Physical
4.1.1 Neurological
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.2 Cardiovascular
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.3 Respiratory
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.4 Reproductive
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.5 Digestive
Not Available
Not Available
4.2 Psychology
Not Available
Not Available
4.3 Healing
Not Available
Not Available
4.4 Qualities Associated
Not Available
Not Available

Catapleiite Vs Williamsite Fracture

Fracture is an important parameter when you compare Catapleiite and Williamsite Physical Properties. It is necessary to understand the significance of these properties, before you compare Catapleiite Vs Williamsite fracture. Whenever a gemstone chip breaks, it leaves a characteristic line along its breakage. Such lines are known as fracture and are used to identify the gemstones in their initial stages of production when they are in the form of rough minerals. Fracture is usually described with the terms “fibrous” and “splintery” to denote a fracture that usually leaves elongated and sharp edges. Fracture observed in Catapleiite is Brittle, Brittle, Metallic and Metallic. Williamsite fracture is Conchoidal, Conchoidal and Handbook of mineralogy (2001).

Catapleiite Vs Williamsite Luster

A primary knowledge about Catapleiite vs Williamsite luster is useful in apparent identifications of these gemstones. Luster is the measure of light that gets reflected when incident on a finished cut gemstone. There are two major types of lusters: Silky and Adamantine. Since luster varies between two crystals of even the same gemstone, luster is limited to basic identification criteria. Catapleiite exhibits Vitreous luster. Williamsite, on other hand, exhibits Greasy, Resinous, Silky and Waxy luster.