×

Chambersite
Chambersite

Chrysocolla
Chrysocolla



ADD
Compare
X
Chambersite
X
Chrysocolla

Chambersite Vs Chrysocolla

1 Astrology
1.1 Origin
China
Southern and central Africa, Sixth Edition (2006)
1.2 Color
Red, Colorless, Red
Blue, Green, Blue, Brown
1.3 Streak
White
White, Blue, Green
1.4 For which Rashi?
Not Available
Taurus
1.5 Planet
Not Available
Venus
1.6 Element of Planets
Not Available
Water
1.7 How to Wear?
1.7.1 Finger
Not Available
Not Available
1.7.2 Ring Metal
Not Available
Not Available
1.8 Energy
Not Available
Receptive
1.9 Deities
Not Available
Venus
1.10 Not to wear with
Not Available
Not Available
1.11 Powers
Not Available
Love
1.12 Birthstone
1.12.1 Planetary
Not Available
Not Available
1.12.2 Talisman
Not Available
Not Available
2 Physical Properties
2.1 Tenacity
Not Available
Brittle
2.2 Solubility
Not Available
Not Available
2.3 Durability
Not Available
Not Available
2.4 Specific Gravity
3.502.00-2.45
Amber
1 7.18
2.5 Fracture
Uneven, Uneven, ConchoidalAnthony et al, Handbook of mineralogy (2001), Conchoidal, Uneven
Sub-Conchoidal, ConchoidalArthur Thomas, Gemstones (2009), Brittle
2.6 Cleavage
None
none
2.7 Mohs Hardness
72-4
Amber
2 10
2.8 Chemical Composition
Mn 3B 7O 13ClMichael O’Donoghue , Gems, Sixth Edition (2006)
Cu2H2Si2O5(OH)4
3 Optical Properties
3.1 Luster
Vitreous
Vitreous, Greasy
3.2 Pleochroism
Not Available
AbsentWalter Schumann
3.3 Dispersion
NANone
Fluorite
0.007 1
3.4 Transparency
Gemmological Tables (2004) More from other references
Opaque
3.5 Refractive Index
1.735-1.7451.460-1.570
Agate Opal
1 3.25
3.6 Optic Character
Not Available
Not Available
3.7 Crystal System
Orthorhombic
monoclinic
3.8 Birefringence
0.0120.023-0.050
Achroite
0 0.296
3.9 Clarity
TransparentUlrich Henn and Claudio C. Milisenda
Gemmological Tables (2004) More from other references
4 Benefits
4.1 Physical
4.1.1 Neurological
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.2 Cardiovascular
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.3 Respiratory
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.4 Reproductive
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.5 Digestive
Not Available
Not Available
4.2 Psychology
Not Available
Not Available
4.3 Healing
Not Available
Not Available
4.4 Qualities Associated
Not Available
Not Available

Chambersite Vs Chrysocolla Fracture

Fracture is an important parameter when you compare Chambersite and Chrysocolla Physical Properties. It is necessary to understand the significance of these properties, before you compare Chambersite Vs Chrysocolla fracture. Whenever a gemstone chip breaks, it leaves a characteristic line along its breakage. Such lines are known as fracture and are used to identify the gemstones in their initial stages of production when they are in the form of rough minerals. Fracture is usually described with the terms “fibrous” and “splintery” to denote a fracture that usually leaves elongated and sharp edges. Fracture observed in Chambersite is Conchoidal, ConchoidalAnthony et al, Handbook of mineralogy (2001), Uneven, Uneven and Uneven. Chrysocolla fracture is Brittle, ConchoidalArthur Thomas, Gemstones (2009) and Sub-Conchoidal.

Chambersite Vs Chrysocolla Luster

A primary knowledge about Chambersite vs Chrysocolla luster is useful in apparent identifications of these gemstones. Luster is the measure of light that gets reflected when incident on a finished cut gemstone. There are two major types of lusters: Silky and Adamantine. Since luster varies between two crystals of even the same gemstone, luster is limited to basic identification criteria. Chambersite exhibits Vitreous luster. Chrysocolla, on other hand, exhibits Greasy and Vitreous luster.