×

Chambersite
Chambersite

Kornerupine
Kornerupine



ADD
Compare
X
Chambersite
X
Kornerupine

Chambersite Vs Kornerupine

1 Astrology
1.1 Origin
China
Tanzania, Madagascar, Kenya, Sri Lanka, Burma, Australia
1.2 Color
Red, Colorless, Red
Green, Brown, Colorless, Greenish, Yellow
1.3 Streak
White
White
1.4 For which Rashi?
Not Available
Not Available
1.5 Planet
Not Available
Not Available
1.6 Element of Planets
Not Available
Not Available
1.7 How to Wear?
1.7.1 Finger
Not Available
Not Available
1.7.2 Ring Metal
Not Available
Not Available
1.8 Energy
Not Available
Not Available
1.9 Deities
Not Available
Not Available
1.10 Not to wear with
Not Available
Not Available
1.11 Powers
Not Available
Not Available
1.12 Birthstone
1.12.1 Planetary
Not Available
Not Available
1.12.2 Talisman
Not Available
Not Available
2 Physical Properties
2.1 Tenacity
Not Available
Not Available
2.2 Solubility
Not Available
Not Available
2.3 Durability
Not Available
Not Available
2.4 Specific Gravity
3.503.25-3.45
Amber
1 7.18
2.5 Fracture
Uneven, Uneven, ConchoidalAnthony et al, Handbook of mineralogy (2001), Conchoidal, Uneven
ConchoidalArthur Thomas, Gemstones (2009), ConchoidalArthur Thomas, Gemstones (2009), Brittle, Uneven
2.6 Cleavage
None
Good on {110}
2.7 Mohs Hardness
76.5
Amber
2 10
2.8 Chemical Composition
Mn 3B 7O 13ClMichael O’Donoghue , Gems, Sixth Edition (2006)
Mg 3Al 6(Si,Al,B) 5O 21(OH)Walter Schumann , Gemstones of the world (2001) More from other references
3 Optical Properties
3.1 Luster
Vitreous
Vitreous
3.2 Pleochroism
Not Available
X = colorless to green; Y = colorless
3.3 Dispersion
NA0.02
Fluorite
0.007 1
3.4 Transparency
Gemmological Tables (2004) More from other references
Gemmological Tables (2004) More from other references
3.5 Refractive Index
1.735-1.7451.660-1.685
Agate Opal
1 3.25
3.6 Optic Character
Not Available
Not Available
3.7 Crystal System
Orthorhombic
Orthorhombic
3.8 Birefringence
0.0120.012-0.017
Achroite
0 0.296
3.9 Clarity
TransparentUlrich Henn and Claudio C. Milisenda
TransparentUlrich Henn and Claudio C. Milisenda
4 Benefits
4.1 Physical
4.1.1 Neurological
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.2 Cardiovascular
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.3 Respiratory
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.4 Reproductive
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.5 Digestive
Not Available
Not Available
4.2 Psychology
Not Available
Not Available
4.3 Healing
Not Available
Not Available
4.4 Qualities Associated
Not Available
Not Available

Chambersite Vs Kornerupine Fracture

Fracture is an important parameter when you compare Chambersite and Kornerupine Physical Properties. It is necessary to understand the significance of these properties, before you compare Chambersite Vs Kornerupine fracture. Whenever a gemstone chip breaks, it leaves a characteristic line along its breakage. Such lines are known as fracture and are used to identify the gemstones in their initial stages of production when they are in the form of rough minerals. Fracture is usually described with the terms “fibrous” and “splintery” to denote a fracture that usually leaves elongated and sharp edges. Fracture observed in Chambersite is Conchoidal, ConchoidalAnthony et al, Handbook of mineralogy (2001), Uneven, Uneven and Uneven. Kornerupine fracture is Brittle, ConchoidalArthur Thomas, ConchoidalArthur Thomas, Gemstones (2009), Gemstones (2009) and Uneven.

Chambersite Vs Kornerupine Luster

A primary knowledge about Chambersite vs Kornerupine luster is useful in apparent identifications of these gemstones. Luster is the measure of light that gets reflected when incident on a finished cut gemstone. There are two major types of lusters: Silky and Adamantine. Since luster varies between two crystals of even the same gemstone, luster is limited to basic identification criteria. Chambersite exhibits Vitreous luster. Kornerupine, on other hand, exhibits Vitreous luster.