×

Chrysocolla
Chrysocolla

Catapleiite
Catapleiite



ADD
Compare
X
Chrysocolla
X
Catapleiite

Chrysocolla Vs Catapleiite

1 Astrology
1.1 Origin
Southern and central Africa, Sixth Edition (2006)
Not Available, Southern and central Africa
1.2 Color
Blue, Green, Blue, Brown
Blue, Brown, Colorless, Yellow, Blue, Brown, Colorless, Yellow
1.3 Streak
White, Blue, Green
White
1.4 For which Rashi?
Taurus
Not Available
1.5 Planet
Venus
Not Available
1.6 Element of Planets
Water
Not Available
1.7 How to Wear?
1.7.1 Finger
Not Available
Not Available
1.7.2 Ring Metal
Not Available
Not Available
1.8 Energy
Receptive
Not Available
1.9 Deities
Venus
Not Available
1.10 Not to wear with
Not Available
Not Available
1.11 Powers
Love
Not Available
1.12 Birthstone
1.12.1 Planetary
Not Available
Not Available
1.12.2 Talisman
Not Available
Not Available
2 Physical Properties
2.1 Tenacity
Brittle
Not Available
2.2 Solubility
Not Available
Not Available
2.3 Durability
Not Available
Not Available
2.4 Specific Gravity
2.00-2.452.72
Amber
1 7.18
2.5 Fracture
Sub-Conchoidal, ConchoidalArthur Thomas, Gemstones (2009), Brittle
Brittle, Metallic, Brittle, Metallic
2.6 Cleavage
none
{110} Perfect, {010} Perfect
2.7 Mohs Hardness
2-45-6
Amber
2 10
2.8 Chemical Composition
Cu2H2Si2O5(OH)4
Na 2ZrSi 3O 9 · 2H 2OMichael O’Donoghue , Gems, Sixth Edition (2006)
3 Optical Properties
3.1 Luster
Vitreous, Greasy
Vitreous
3.2 Pleochroism
AbsentWalter Schumann
Not Available
3.3 Dispersion
NoneNA
Fluorite
0.007 1
3.4 Transparency
Opaque
TransparentUlrich Henn and Claudio C. Milisenda, Gemmological Tables (2004)
3.5 Refractive Index
1.460-1.5701.590-1.629
Agate Opal
1 3.25
3.6 Optic Character
Not Available
Not Available
3.7 Crystal System
monoclinic
Monoclinic Prismatic H-M Symbol (2/m) Space Group: B2/b (pseudo-HEX)
3.8 Birefringence
0.023-0.0500.039
Achroite
0 0.296
3.9 Clarity
Gemmological Tables (2004) More from other references
TransparentUlrich Henn and Claudio C. Milisenda
4 Benefits
4.1 Physical
4.1.1 Neurological
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.2 Cardiovascular
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.3 Respiratory
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.4 Reproductive
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.5 Digestive
Not Available
Not Available
4.2 Psychology
Not Available
Not Available
4.3 Healing
Not Available
Not Available
4.4 Qualities Associated
Not Available
Not Available

Chrysocolla Vs Catapleiite Fracture

Fracture is an important parameter when you compare Chrysocolla and Catapleiite Physical Properties. It is necessary to understand the significance of these properties, before you compare Chrysocolla Vs Catapleiite fracture. Whenever a gemstone chip breaks, it leaves a characteristic line along its breakage. Such lines are known as fracture and are used to identify the gemstones in their initial stages of production when they are in the form of rough minerals. Fracture is usually described with the terms “fibrous” and “splintery” to denote a fracture that usually leaves elongated and sharp edges. Fracture observed in Chrysocolla is Brittle, ConchoidalArthur Thomas, Gemstones (2009) and Sub-Conchoidal. Catapleiite fracture is Brittle, Brittle, Metallic and Metallic.

Chrysocolla Vs Catapleiite Luster

A primary knowledge about Chrysocolla vs Catapleiite luster is useful in apparent identifications of these gemstones. Luster is the measure of light that gets reflected when incident on a finished cut gemstone. There are two major types of lusters: Silky and Adamantine. Since luster varies between two crystals of even the same gemstone, luster is limited to basic identification criteria. Chrysocolla exhibits Greasy and Vitreous luster. Catapleiite, on other hand, exhibits Vitreous luster.