Chrysocolla

Emerald

Chrysocolla Vs Emerald

Chrysocolla

Emerald

Add ⊕

1 Astrology

1.1 Origin

Southern and central Africa, Sixth Edition (2006)

Colombia, Zambia, Brazil, Madagascar, Southern and central Africa, Zimbabwe, Russia, India, Pakistan, Australia, USA, Not Available, Mexico, Spain

1.2 Color

Blue, Green, Blue, Brown

Green, Green, Blue, Yellow, Grey

1.3 Streak

White, Blue, Green

White

1.4 For which Rashi?

Taurus

Taurus, Gemini, Aries, Taurus, Gemini, Aries, Taurus, Gemini, Aries

1.5 Planet

Venus

Venus, Mercury

1.6 Element of Planets

Water

Earth

1.7 How to Wear?

1.7.1 Finger

Not Available

1.7.2 Ring Metal

Not Available

Gold

1.8 Energy

Receptive

1.9 Deities

Venus

Diana, Artemis, Venus, Freyja

1.10 Not to wear with

Not Available

Red Coral, Natural Pearl, Moonstone, Ruby, Red Coral, Natural Pearl, Moonstone, Ruby

1.11 Powers

Love

Money, Protection, Love, Courage

1.12 Birthstone

1.12.1 Planetary

Not Available

Taurus

1.12.2 Talisman

Not Available

Gemini

2 Physical Properties

2.1 Tenacity

Brittle

Not Available

2.2 Solubility

Not Available

2.3 Durability

Not Available

Hard

2.4 Specific Gravity

2.00-2.452.67-2.78

1 7.18

2.5 Fracture

Sub-Conchoidal, ConchoidalArthur Thomas, Gemstones (2009), Brittle

Uneven, Uneven, ConchoidalWalter Schumann, Gemstones of the world (2001)

2.6 Cleavage

none

Imperfect on the [0001]

2.7 Mohs Hardness

2-47.5-8

2 10

2.8 Chemical Composition

Cu₂H₂Si₂O₅(OH)₄

Be₃Al₂SiO₆

3 Optical Properties

3.1 Luster

Vitreous, Greasy

Vitreous

3.2 Pleochroism

AbsentWalter Schumann

Strong dichroism: yellow green Lazzarelli

3.3 Dispersion

None0.01

0.007 1

3.4 Transparency

Opaque

Transparent, Translucent, Transparent to translucent

3.5 Refractive Index

1.460-1.5701.565-1.602

1 3.25

3.6 Optic Character

Not Available

3.7 Crystal System

monoclinic

Hexagonal

3.8 Birefringence

0.023-0.0500.0040-0.0070

0 0.296

3.9 Clarity

Gemmological Tables (2004) More from other references

Color grading system

4 Benefits

4.1 Physical

4.1.1 Neurological

Not Available

4.1.2 Cardiovascular

Not Available

4.1.3 Respiratory

Not Available

4.1.4 Reproductive

Not Available

4.1.5 Digestive

Not Available

4.2 Psychology

Not Available

4.3 Healing

Not Available

4.4 Qualities Associated

Not Available

Chrysocolla Vs Emerald Fracture

Fracture is an important parameter when you compare Chrysocolla and Emerald Physical Properties. It is necessary to understand the significance of these properties, before you compare Chrysocolla Vs Emerald fracture. Whenever a gemstone chip breaks, it leaves a characteristic line along its breakage. Such lines are known as fracture and are used to identify the gemstones in their initial stages of production when they are in the form of rough minerals. Fracture is usually described with the terms “fibrous” and “splintery” to denote a fracture that usually leaves elongated and sharp edges. Fracture observed in Chrysocolla is Brittle, ConchoidalArthur Thomas, Gemstones (2009) and Sub-Conchoidal. Emerald fracture is ConchoidalWalter Schumann, Gemstones of the world (2001), Uneven and Uneven.

Compare Gems for Taurus » More

Chrysocolla Vs Prasiolite

Chrysocolla Vs Quartz

Chrysocolla Vs Rhodolite

» More

More Compare Gems for Taurus

Chrysocolla Vs Emerald Luster

A primary knowledge about Chrysocolla vs Emerald luster is useful in apparent identifications of these gemstones. Luster is the measure of light that gets reflected when incident on a finished cut gemstone. There are two major types of lusters: Silky and Adamantine. Since luster varies between two crystals of even the same gemstone, luster is limited to basic identification criteria. Chrysocolla exhibits Greasy and Vitreous luster. Emerald, on other hand, exhibits Vitreous luster.