Chrysocolla

Fluorapatite

Chrysocolla Vs Fluorapatite

Chrysocolla

Fluorapatite

Add ⊕

1 Astrology

1.1 Origin

Southern and central Africa, Sixth Edition (2006)

Southern and central Africa

1.2 Color

Blue, Green, Blue, Brown

Violet, Blue, Yellow, Brown, White, Colorless

1.3 Streak

White, Blue, Green

White

1.4 For which Rashi?

Taurus

Not Available

1.5 Planet

Venus

Not Available

1.6 Element of Planets

Water

Not Available

1.7 How to Wear?

1.7.1 Finger

Not Available

1.7.2 Ring Metal

Not Available

1.8 Energy

Receptive

Not Available

1.9 Deities

Venus

Not Available

1.10 Not to wear with

Not Available

1.11 Powers

Love

Not Available

1.12 Birthstone

1.12.1 Planetary

Not Available

1.12.2 Talisman

Not Available

2 Physical Properties

2.1 Tenacity

Brittle

Not Available

2.2 Solubility

Not Available

2.3 Durability

Not Available

2.4 Specific Gravity

2.00-2.453.1-3.25

1 7.18

2.5 Fracture

Sub-Conchoidal, ConchoidalArthur Thomas, Gemstones (2009), Brittle

Uneven, Uneven, ConchoidalAnthony et al, Handbook of mineralogy (2001)

2.6 Cleavage

none

Indistinct

2.7 Mohs Hardness

2-45

2 10

2.8 Chemical Composition

Cu₂H₂Si₂O₅(OH)₄

Ca 5(PO 4) 3FAnthony et al , Handbook of mineralogy (2001)

3 Optical Properties

3.1 Luster

Vitreous, Greasy

Vitreous, Resinous

3.2 Pleochroism

AbsentWalter Schumann

Weak to strong if coloreD

3.3 Dispersion

NoneNA

0.007 1

3.4 Transparency

Opaque

Transparent

3.5 Refractive Index

1.460-1.5701.631-1.650

1 3.25

3.6 Optic Character

Not Available

3.7 Crystal System

monoclinic

Hexagonal

3.8 Birefringence

0.023-0.050Not Available

0 0.296

3.9 Clarity

Gemmological Tables (2004) More from other references

Transparent

4 Benefits

4.1 Physical

4.1.1 Neurological

Not Available

4.1.2 Cardiovascular

Not Available

4.1.3 Respiratory

Not Available

4.1.4 Reproductive

Not Available

4.1.5 Digestive

Not Available

4.2 Psychology

Not Available

4.3 Healing

Not Available

4.4 Qualities Associated

Not Available

Chrysocolla Vs Fluorapatite Fracture

Fracture is an important parameter when you compare Chrysocolla and Fluorapatite Physical Properties. It is necessary to understand the significance of these properties, before you compare Chrysocolla Vs Fluorapatite fracture. Whenever a gemstone chip breaks, it leaves a characteristic line along its breakage. Such lines are known as fracture and are used to identify the gemstones in their initial stages of production when they are in the form of rough minerals. Fracture is usually described with the terms “fibrous” and “splintery” to denote a fracture that usually leaves elongated and sharp edges. Fracture observed in Chrysocolla is Brittle, ConchoidalArthur Thomas, Gemstones (2009) and Sub-Conchoidal. Fluorapatite fracture is ConchoidalAnthony et al, Handbook of mineralogy (2001), Uneven and Uneven.

Compare Gems for Taurus » More

Chrysocolla Vs Quartz

Chrysocolla Vs Prasiolite

Chrysocolla Vs Rhodolite

» More

More Compare Gems for Taurus

Chrysocolla Vs Fluorapatite Luster

A primary knowledge about Chrysocolla vs Fluorapatite luster is useful in apparent identifications of these gemstones. Luster is the measure of light that gets reflected when incident on a finished cut gemstone. There are two major types of lusters: Silky and Adamantine. Since luster varies between two crystals of even the same gemstone, luster is limited to basic identification criteria. Chrysocolla exhibits Greasy and Vitreous luster. Fluorapatite, on other hand, exhibits Resinous and Vitreous luster.