×

Chrysocolla
Chrysocolla

Labradorite
Labradorite



ADD
Compare
X
Chrysocolla
X
Labradorite

Chrysocolla Vs Labradorite

1 Astrology
1.1 Origin
Southern and central Africa, Sixth Edition (2006)
Canada, USA, Mexico, Madagascar, Australia, Not Available, Finland, India, Russia, Yellow, blue, Orange
1.2 Color
Blue, Green, Blue, Brown
Violet, Colorless, gray, White, Green
1.3 Streak
White, Blue, Green
White
1.4 For which Rashi?
Taurus
Aquarius
1.5 Planet
Venus
Not Available
1.6 Element of Planets
Water
Water
1.7 How to Wear?
1.7.1 Finger
Not Available
Not Available
1.7.2 Ring Metal
Not Available
Not Available
1.8 Energy
Receptive
Not Available
1.9 Deities
Venus
Isis
1.10 Not to wear with
Not Available
Not Available
1.11 Powers
Love
Protection, Psychic Power
1.12 Birthstone
1.12.1 Planetary
Not Available
Not Available
1.12.2 Talisman
Not Available
Not Available
2 Physical Properties
2.1 Tenacity
Brittle
Not Available
2.2 Solubility
Not Available
Not Available
2.3 Durability
Not Available
Not Available
2.4 Specific Gravity
2.00-2.452.69-2.72
Amber
1 7.18
2.5 Fracture
Sub-Conchoidal, ConchoidalArthur Thomas, Gemstones (2009), Brittle
Uneven, Conchoidal, Gems, Sixth Edition (2006)
2.6 Cleavage
none
Perfect on {001}, less perfect on {010}, intersecting at near 90°; distinct on {110}
2.7 Mohs Hardness
2-46-6.5
Amber
2 10
2.8 Chemical Composition
Cu2H2Si2O5(OH)4
(Na,Ca)1-2Si3-2O8
3 Optical Properties
3.1 Luster
Vitreous, Greasy
Vitreous, Pearly
3.2 Pleochroism
AbsentWalter Schumann
From the Congo
3.3 Dispersion
None0.01
Fluorite
0.007 1
3.4 Transparency
Opaque
Transparent, Translucent, Transparent to translucent
3.5 Refractive Index
1.460-1.5701.554-1.573
Agate Opal
1 3.25
3.6 Optic Character
Not Available
Not Available
3.7 Crystal System
monoclinic
Triclinic
3.8 Birefringence
0.023-0.0500.008-0.010
Achroite
0 0.296
3.9 Clarity
Gemmological Tables (2004) More from other references
Transparent
4 Benefits
4.1 Physical
4.1.1 Neurological
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.2 Cardiovascular
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.3 Respiratory
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.4 Reproductive
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.5 Digestive
Not Available
Not Available
4.2 Psychology
Not Available
Not Available
4.3 Healing
Not Available
Not Available
4.4 Qualities Associated
Not Available
Not Available

Chrysocolla Vs Labradorite Fracture

Fracture is an important parameter when you compare Chrysocolla and Labradorite Physical Properties. It is necessary to understand the significance of these properties, before you compare Chrysocolla Vs Labradorite fracture. Whenever a gemstone chip breaks, it leaves a characteristic line along its breakage. Such lines are known as fracture and are used to identify the gemstones in their initial stages of production when they are in the form of rough minerals. Fracture is usually described with the terms “fibrous” and “splintery” to denote a fracture that usually leaves elongated and sharp edges. Fracture observed in Chrysocolla is Brittle, ConchoidalArthur Thomas, Gemstones (2009) and Sub-Conchoidal. Labradorite fracture is Conchoidal, Gems, Sixth Edition (2006) and Uneven.

Chrysocolla Vs Labradorite Luster

A primary knowledge about Chrysocolla vs Labradorite luster is useful in apparent identifications of these gemstones. Luster is the measure of light that gets reflected when incident on a finished cut gemstone. There are two major types of lusters: Silky and Adamantine. Since luster varies between two crystals of even the same gemstone, luster is limited to basic identification criteria. Chrysocolla exhibits Greasy and Vitreous luster. Labradorite, on other hand, exhibits Pearly and Vitreous luster.