Chrysocolla

Xonotlite

Chrysocolla Vs Xonotlite

Chrysocolla

Xonotlite

Add ⊕

1 Astrology

1.1 Origin

Southern and central Africa, Sixth Edition (2006)

Mexico

1.2 Color

Blue, Green, Blue, Brown

White, Colorless, gray, pink

1.3 Streak

White, Blue, Green

Colorless, White

1.4 For which Rashi?

Taurus

Not Available

1.5 Planet

Venus

Not Available

1.6 Element of Planets

Water

Not Available

1.7 How to Wear?

1.7.1 Finger

Not Available

1.7.2 Ring Metal

Not Available

1.8 Energy

Receptive

Not Available

1.9 Deities

Venus

Not Available

1.10 Not to wear with

Not Available

1.11 Powers

Love

Not Available

1.12 Birthstone

1.12.1 Planetary

Not Available

1.12.2 Talisman

Not Available

2 Physical Properties

2.1 Tenacity

Brittle

Not Available

2.2 Solubility

Not Available

2.3 Durability

Not Available

2.4 Specific Gravity

2.00-2.452.71-2.72

1 7.18

2.5 Fracture

Sub-Conchoidal, ConchoidalArthur Thomas, Gemstones (2009), Brittle

Handbook of mineralogy (2001), Difficult, Fibrous

2.6 Cleavage

none

{???} Good

2.7 Mohs Hardness

2-46-6.5

2 10

2.8 Chemical Composition

Cu₂H₂Si₂O₅(OH)₄

Ca 6Si 6O 17(OH) 2Michael OâDonoghue , Gems, Sixth Edition (2006)

3 Optical Properties

3.1 Luster

Vitreous, Greasy

Vitreous, Silky

3.2 Pleochroism

AbsentWalter Schumann

Not Available

3.3 Dispersion

NoneNA

0.007 1

3.4 Transparency

Opaque

Gems, Sixth Edition (2006)

3.5 Refractive Index

1.460-1.5701.581-1.593

1 3.25

3.6 Optic Character

Not Available

3.7 Crystal System

monoclinic

3.8 Birefringence

0.023-0.0500.010

0 0.296

3.9 Clarity

Gemmological Tables (2004) More from other references

Gems

4 Benefits

4.1 Physical

4.1.1 Neurological

Not Available

4.1.2 Cardiovascular

Not Available

4.1.3 Respiratory

Not Available

4.1.4 Reproductive

Not Available

4.1.5 Digestive

Not Available

4.2 Psychology

Not Available

4.3 Healing

Not Available

4.4 Qualities Associated

Not Available

Chrysocolla Vs Xonotlite Fracture

Fracture is an important parameter when you compare Chrysocolla and Xonotlite Physical Properties. It is necessary to understand the significance of these properties, before you compare Chrysocolla Vs Xonotlite fracture. Whenever a gemstone chip breaks, it leaves a characteristic line along its breakage. Such lines are known as fracture and are used to identify the gemstones in their initial stages of production when they are in the form of rough minerals. Fracture is usually described with the terms “fibrous” and “splintery” to denote a fracture that usually leaves elongated and sharp edges. Fracture observed in Chrysocolla is Brittle, ConchoidalArthur Thomas, Gemstones (2009) and Sub-Conchoidal. Xonotlite fracture is Difficult, Fibrous and Handbook of mineralogy (2001).

Compare Gems for Taurus » More

Chrysocolla Vs Prasiolite

Chrysocolla Vs Rhodolite

Chrysocolla Vs Quartz

» More

More Compare Gems for Taurus

Chrysocolla Vs Xonotlite Luster

A primary knowledge about Chrysocolla vs Xonotlite luster is useful in apparent identifications of these gemstones. Luster is the measure of light that gets reflected when incident on a finished cut gemstone. There are two major types of lusters: Silky and Adamantine. Since luster varies between two crystals of even the same gemstone, luster is limited to basic identification criteria. Chrysocolla exhibits Greasy and Vitreous luster. Xonotlite, on other hand, exhibits Silky and Vitreous luster.