Home
×

Chrysotile
Chrysotile

Omphacite
Omphacite



ADD
Compare
X
Chrysotile
X
Omphacite

Chrysotile Vs Omphacite

1 Astrology
1.1 Origin
Southern and central Africa
Southern and central Africa
1.2 Color
Grey, Green
Green
1.3 Streak
White
Greenish, White
1.4 For which Rashi?
Not Available
Not Available
1.5 Planet
Not Available
Not Available
1.6 Element of Planets
Not Available
Not Available
1.7 How to Wear?
1.7.1 Finger
Not Available
Not Available
1.7.2 Ring Metal
Not Available
Not Available
1.8 Energy
Not Available
Not Available
1.9 Deities
Not Available
Not Available
1.10 Not to wear with
Not Available
Not Available
1.11 Powers
Not Available
Not Available
1.12 Birthstone
1.12.1 Planetary
Not Available
Not Available
1.12.2 Talisman
Not Available
Not Available
2 Physical Properties
2.1 Tenacity
Not Available
Not Available
2.2 Solubility
insoluble in water
Not Available
2.3 Durability
Not Available
Not Available
2.4 Specific Gravity
2.51-2.63
3.16-3.43
2.5 Fracture
Fibrous
Uneven, Uneven, ConchoidalAnthony et al, Handbook of mineralogy (2001), Brittle, Conchoidal
2.6 Cleavage
Not Available
{110} Good, {110} Good
2.7 Mohs Hardness
2.5-4.5
5-6
2.8 Chemical Composition
Mg 3(Si 2O 5)(OH) 4Gemdat.org , Management Team (2012)
(Ca,Na)(Mg,Fe,Al)Si 2O 6Anthony et al , Handbook of Mineralogy (2001)
3 Optical Properties
3.1 Luster
Silky
Vitreous
3.2 Pleochroism
Not Available
Weak: colorless -- very pale green -- very pale green
3.3 Dispersion
Albite
Not Available
Rank: N/A (Overall)
Not Available
Rank: N/A (Overall)
Fluorite
ADD ⊕
3.4 Transparency
Not Available
TranslucentAnthony et al, Handbook of mineralogy (2001)
3.5 Refractive Index
1.530-1.575
1.662-1.723
3.6 Optic Character
Not Available
Not Available
3.7 Crystal System
Monoclinic : clinochrysotile (most common)
Not Available
3.8 Birefringence
0.001
Not Available
3.9 Clarity
Not Available
TranslucentAnthony et al
4 Benefits
4.1 Physical
4.1.1 Neurological
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.2 Cardiovascular
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.3 Respiratory
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.4 Reproductive
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.5 Digestive
Not Available
Not Available
4.2 Psychology
Not Available
Not Available
4.3 Healing
Not Available
Not Available
4.4 Qualities Associated
Not Available
Not Available

Chrysotile Vs Omphacite Fracture

Fracture is an important parameter when you compare Chrysotile and Omphacite Physical Properties. It is necessary to understand the significance of these properties, before you compare Chrysotile Vs Omphacite fracture. Whenever a gemstone chip breaks, it leaves a characteristic line along its breakage. Such lines are known as fracture and are used to identify the gemstones in their initial stages of production when they are in the form of rough minerals. Fracture is usually described with the terms “fibrous” and “splintery” to denote a fracture that usually leaves elongated and sharp edges. Fracture observed in Chrysotile is Fibrous. Omphacite fracture is Brittle, Conchoidal, ConchoidalAnthony et al, Handbook of mineralogy (2001), Uneven and Uneven.

Chrysotile Vs Omphacite Luster

A primary knowledge about Chrysotile vs Omphacite luster is useful in apparent identifications of these gemstones. Luster is the measure of light that gets reflected when incident on a finished cut gemstone. There are two major types of lusters: Silky and Adamantine. Since luster varies between two crystals of even the same gemstone, luster is limited to basic identification criteria. Chrysotile exhibits Silky luster. Omphacite, on other hand, exhibits Vitreous luster.