×

Cinnabar
Cinnabar

Euclase
Euclase



ADD
Compare
X
Cinnabar
X
Euclase

Cinnabar Vs Euclase

Add ⊕
1 Astrology
1.1 Origin
Spain, China
Brazil, Colombia, Southern and central Africa
1.2 Color
Red, gray, Brown, pink
Greenish, Blue, Colorless, White, Green
1.3 Streak
Scarlet, Red
White
1.4 For which Rashi?
Not Available
Not Available
1.5 Planet
Not Available
Not Available
1.6 Element of Planets
Not Available
Not Available
1.7 How to Wear?
1.7.1 Finger
Not Available
Not Available
1.7.2 Ring Metal
Not Available
Not Available
1.8 Energy
Not Available
Not Available
1.9 Deities
Not Available
Not Available
1.10 Not to wear with
Not Available
Not Available
1.11 Powers
Not Available
Not Available
1.12 Birthstone
1.12.1 Planetary
Not Available
Not Available
1.12.2 Talisman
Not Available
Not Available
2 Physical Properties
2.1 Tenacity
Slightly sectile
Not Available
2.2 Solubility
1.04 x 10−25 g per 100 ml water (Ksp at 25°C = 2 x 10−32)
Not Available
2.3 Durability
Not Available
Not Available
2.4 Specific Gravity
23.08-3.12
Amber
1 7.18
2.5 Fracture
Uneven, Uneven, Gemstones (2009), Brittle
ConchoidalWalter Schumann, Gemstones of the world (2001), ConchoidalWalter Schumann, Gemstones of the world (2001), Brittle, Metallic
2.6 Cleavage
Prismatic {10 1 0}, perfect
{010} Perfect
2.7 Mohs Hardness
2-2.57.5
Amber
2 10
2.8 Chemical Composition
HgSMichael O’Donoghue , Gems, Sixth Edition (2006) More from other references
BeAlSiO 4(OH)Michael O’Donoghue , Gems, Sixth Edition (2006) More from other references
3 Optical Properties
3.1 Luster
Adamantine
Vitreous
3.2 Pleochroism
NilArthur Thomas
Weak: colorless-(greenish) yellow
3.3 Dispersion
NA0.02
Fluorite
0.007 1
3.4 Transparency
Translucent
Gemmological Tables (2004) More from other references
3.5 Refractive Index
2.905-3.251.650-1.677
Agate Opal
1 3.25
3.6 Optic Character
Not Available
Not Available
3.7 Crystal System
Trigonal
Monoclinic Prismatic H-M Symbol (2/m) Space Group: P 21/a
3.8 Birefringence
Not Available0.019-0.025
Achroite
0 0.296
3.9 Clarity
Translucent
TransparentUlrich Henn and Claudio C. Milisenda
4 Benefits
4.1 Physical
4.1.1 Neurological
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.2 Cardiovascular
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.3 Respiratory
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.4 Reproductive
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.5 Digestive
Not Available
Not Available
4.2 Psychology
Not Available
Not Available
4.3 Healing
Not Available
Not Available
4.4 Qualities Associated
Not Available
Not Available

Cinnabar Vs Euclase Fracture

Fracture is an important parameter when you compare Cinnabar and Euclase Physical Properties. It is necessary to understand the significance of these properties, before you compare Cinnabar Vs Euclase fracture. Whenever a gemstone chip breaks, it leaves a characteristic line along its breakage. Such lines are known as fracture and are used to identify the gemstones in their initial stages of production when they are in the form of rough minerals. Fracture is usually described with the terms “fibrous” and “splintery” to denote a fracture that usually leaves elongated and sharp edges. Fracture observed in Cinnabar is Brittle, Gemstones (2009), Uneven and Uneven. Euclase fracture is Brittle, ConchoidalWalter Schumann, ConchoidalWalter Schumann, Gemstones of the world (2001), Gemstones of the world (2001) and Metallic.

Cinnabar Vs Euclase Luster

A primary knowledge about Cinnabar vs Euclase luster is useful in apparent identifications of these gemstones. Luster is the measure of light that gets reflected when incident on a finished cut gemstone. There are two major types of lusters: Silky and Adamantine. Since luster varies between two crystals of even the same gemstone, luster is limited to basic identification criteria. Cinnabar exhibits Adamantine luster. Euclase, on other hand, exhibits Vitreous luster.