×

Clinochlore
Clinochlore

Petalite
Petalite



ADD
Compare
X
Clinochlore
X
Petalite

Clinochlore Vs Petalite

1 Astrology
1.1 Origin
Southern and central Africa
Canada, USA, Brazil, Italy, Mozambique, Zimbabwe, Russia, Burma, Australia
1.2 Color
Green, Grey, Green, White
Colorless, gray, Yellow, White
1.3 Streak
White
Colorless
1.4 For which Rashi?
Not Available
Not Available
1.5 Planet
Not Available
Not Available
1.6 Element of Planets
Not Available
Not Available
1.7 How to Wear?
1.7.1 Finger
Not Available
Not Available
1.7.2 Ring Metal
Not Available
Not Available
1.8 Energy
Not Available
Not Available
1.9 Deities
Not Available
Not Available
1.10 Not to wear with
Not Available
Not Available
1.11 Powers
Not Available
Not Available
1.12 Birthstone
1.12.1 Planetary
Not Available
Not Available
1.12.2 Talisman
Not Available
Not Available
2 Physical Properties
2.1 Tenacity
Not Available
Brittle
2.2 Solubility
Not Available
insoluble
2.3 Durability
Not Available
Not Available
2.4 Specific Gravity
2.60-3.022.40
Amber
1 7.18
2.5 Fracture
Uneven
Subconchoidal, ConchoidalWalter Schumann, Gemstones of the world (2001) More from other references, Brittle, Conchoidal
2.6 Cleavage
{001} Perfect
Perfect on {001}, poor on {201} with 38.5° angle between the two
2.7 Mohs Hardness
2-2.56-6.5
Amber
2 10
2.8 Chemical Composition
(Mg,Fe2+ ) 5Al(Si 3Al)O 10(OH) 8Anthony et al , Handbook of mineralogy (2001)
LiAlSi 4O 10Michael O’Donoghue , Gems, Sixth Edition (2006) More from other references
3 Optical Properties
3.1 Luster
Pearly, Greasy
Vitreous, Pearly
3.2 Pleochroism
Distinct: light yellow-green to light bluE
AbsentWalter Schumann
3.3 Dispersion
NA0.01
Fluorite
0.007 1
3.4 Transparency
Transparent
Gemmological Tables (2004) More from other references
3.5 Refractive Index
1.571-1.5971.502-1.523
Agate Opal
1 3.25
3.6 Optic Character
Biaxial/+
Not Available
3.7 Crystal System
Monoclinic Prismatic H-M Symbol (2/m) Space Group: C 2/m
monoclinic
3.8 Birefringence
Not Available0.012-0.016
Achroite
0 0.296
3.9 Clarity
Transparent
TransparentUlrich Henn and Claudio C. Milisenda
4 Benefits
4.1 Physical
4.1.1 Neurological
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.2 Cardiovascular
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.3 Respiratory
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.4 Reproductive
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.5 Digestive
Not Available
Not Available
4.2 Psychology
Not Available
Not Available
4.3 Healing
Not Available
Not Available
4.4 Qualities Associated
Not Available
Not Available

Clinochlore Vs Petalite Fracture

Fracture is an important parameter when you compare Clinochlore and Petalite Physical Properties. It is necessary to understand the significance of these properties, before you compare Clinochlore Vs Petalite fracture. Whenever a gemstone chip breaks, it leaves a characteristic line along its breakage. Such lines are known as fracture and are used to identify the gemstones in their initial stages of production when they are in the form of rough minerals. Fracture is usually described with the terms “fibrous” and “splintery” to denote a fracture that usually leaves elongated and sharp edges. Fracture observed in Clinochlore is Uneven. Petalite fracture is Brittle, Conchoidal, ConchoidalWalter Schumann, Gemstones of the world (2001) More from other references and Subconchoidal.

Clinochlore Vs Petalite Luster

A primary knowledge about Clinochlore vs Petalite luster is useful in apparent identifications of these gemstones. Luster is the measure of light that gets reflected when incident on a finished cut gemstone. There are two major types of lusters: Silky and Adamantine. Since luster varies between two crystals of even the same gemstone, luster is limited to basic identification criteria. Clinochlore exhibits Greasy and Pearly luster. Petalite, on other hand, exhibits Pearly and Vitreous luster.