×

Cryolite
Cryolite

Topaz
Topaz



ADD
Compare
X
Cryolite
X
Topaz

Cryolite Vs Topaz

Add ⊕
1 Astrology
1.1 Origin
Not Available
Brazil, Madagascar, Russia, USA, Mexico, Pakistan, brown, Yellow, Orange, Brazil, Sri Lanka, Pakistan, Russia, brown, Yellow, Orange, Brazil, Sri Lanka, Pakistan, Russia
1.2 Color
Colorless, White, Brownish, Reddish, Black, Brownish, Black, Colorless, gray, White, Reddish, Brown
Yellow, Blue, Green, Red, White, Colorless, Blue, Red, Green, Yellow, pink, Brown
1.3 Streak
White
White
1.4 For which Rashi?
Not Available
Sagittarius
1.5 Planet
Not Available
Sun
1.6 Element of Planets
Not Available
Not Available
1.7 How to Wear?
1.7.1 Finger
Not Available
Not Available
1.7.2 Ring Metal
Not Available
Not Available
1.8 Energy
Not Available
Projective
1.9 Deities
Not Available
Ra
1.10 Not to wear with
Not Available
Not Available
1.11 Powers
Not Available
Healing, Love, Money
1.12 Birthstone
1.12.1 Planetary
Not Available
Not Available
1.12.2 Talisman
Not Available
Not Available
2 Physical Properties
2.1 Tenacity
Brittle
Not Available
2.2 Solubility
Soluble
Not Available
2.3 Durability
Not Available
Not Available
2.4 Specific Gravity
2.973.49-3.57
Amber
1 7.18
2.5 Fracture
Uneven
Subconchoidal, Uneven, ConchoidalArthur Thomas, Gemstones (2009), Brittle
2.6 Cleavage
None observed
[001] Perfect
2.7 Mohs Hardness
2.58
Amber
2 10
2.8 Chemical Composition
Na 3AlF 6Ulrich Henn and Claudio C.
Al2SiO4(F,OH)2
3 Optical Properties
3.1 Luster
Vitreous, Greasy, Pearly
Vitreous
3.2 Pleochroism
colorless.
Weak
3.3 Dispersion
NA0.01
Fluorite
0.007 1
3.4 Transparency
Gemmological Tables (2004) More from other references
Transparent
3.5 Refractive Index
1.338-1.3391.606-1.644
Agate Opal
1 3.25
3.6 Optic Character
Not Available
Not Available
3.7 Crystal System
monoclinic
Orthorhombic
3.8 Birefringence
0.0010.008-0.011
Achroite
0 0.296
3.9 Clarity
TransparentUlrich Henn and Claudio C. Milisenda
TransparentUlrich Henn and Claudio C. Milisenda
4 Benefits
4.1 Physical
4.1.1 Neurological
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.2 Cardiovascular
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.3 Respiratory
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.4 Reproductive
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.5 Digestive
Not Available
Not Available
4.2 Psychology
Not Available
Not Available
4.3 Healing
Not Available
Not Available
4.4 Qualities Associated
Not Available
Not Available

Cryolite Vs Topaz Fracture

Fracture is an important parameter when you compare Cryolite and Topaz Physical Properties. It is necessary to understand the significance of these properties, before you compare Cryolite Vs Topaz fracture. Whenever a gemstone chip breaks, it leaves a characteristic line along its breakage. Such lines are known as fracture and are used to identify the gemstones in their initial stages of production when they are in the form of rough minerals. Fracture is usually described with the terms “fibrous” and “splintery” to denote a fracture that usually leaves elongated and sharp edges. Fracture observed in Cryolite is Uneven. Topaz fracture is Brittle, ConchoidalArthur Thomas, Gemstones (2009), Subconchoidal and Uneven.

Cryolite Vs Topaz Luster

A primary knowledge about Cryolite vs Topaz luster is useful in apparent identifications of these gemstones. Luster is the measure of light that gets reflected when incident on a finished cut gemstone. There are two major types of lusters: Silky and Adamantine. Since luster varies between two crystals of even the same gemstone, luster is limited to basic identification criteria. Cryolite exhibits Greasy, Pearly and Vitreous luster. Topaz, on other hand, exhibits Vitreous luster.