×

Cubic Zirconia
Cubic Zirconia

Smithsonite
Smithsonite



ADD
Compare
X
Cubic Zirconia
X
Smithsonite

Cubic Zirconia Vs Smithsonite

1 Astrology
1.1 Origin
Southern and central Africa
USA, Southern and central Africa
1.2 Color
Colorless, Yellow, Brown
Brown, Green, White, gray, Blue, Yellow
1.3 Streak
Not Available
White
1.4 For which Rashi?
Chakra Gemstone Properties
Not Available
1.5 Planet
Not Available
Not Available
1.6 Element of Planets
Earth
Not Available
1.7 How to Wear?
1.7.1 Finger
Not Available
Not Available
1.7.2 Ring Metal
Not Available
Not Available
1.8 Energy
Not Available
Not Available
1.9 Deities
Not Available
Not Available
1.10 Not to wear with
Not Available
Not Available
1.11 Powers
Healing
Not Available
1.12 Birthstone
1.12.1 Planetary
Not Available
Not Available
1.12.2 Talisman
Not Available
Not Available
2 Physical Properties
2.1 Tenacity
Not Available
Brittle
2.2 Solubility
Not Available
Not Available
2.3 Durability
Not Available
Not Available
2.4 Specific Gravity
5.50-6.004.00-4.65
Amber
1 7.18
2.5 Fracture
Not Available
Uneven, Sub-Conchoidal, UnevenWalter Schumann, Gemstones of the world (2001) More from other references, Brittle, Metallic
2.6 Cleavage
Not Available
Perfect on [1011]
2.7 Mohs Hardness
8.55-5.5
Amber
2 10
2.8 Chemical Composition
ZrO 2 + CaO or Y 2O 3 or MgOUlrich Henn and Claudio C.
ZnCO 3Michael O’Donoghue , Gems, Sixth Edition (2006) More from other references
3 Optical Properties
3.1 Luster
Not Available
Vitreous, Pearly
3.2 Pleochroism
Not Available
AbsentWalter Schumann
3.3 Dispersion
NA0.01
Fluorite
0.007 1
3.4 Transparency
Transparent
Translucent
3.5 Refractive Index
2.150-2.1821.620-1.850
Agate Opal
1 3.25
3.6 Optic Character
Not Available
Not Available
3.7 Crystal System
Isometric
Trigonal
3.8 Birefringence
Not Available0.223-0.227
Achroite
0 0.296
3.9 Clarity
Transparent
Translucent
4 Benefits
4.1 Physical
4.1.1 Neurological
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.2 Cardiovascular
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.3 Respiratory
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.4 Reproductive
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.5 Digestive
Not Available
Not Available
4.2 Psychology
Not Available
Not Available
4.3 Healing
Not Available
Not Available
4.4 Qualities Associated
Not Available
Not Available

Cubic Zirconia Vs Smithsonite Fracture

Fracture is an important parameter when you compare Cubic Zirconia and Smithsonite Physical Properties. It is necessary to understand the significance of these properties, before you compare Cubic Zirconia Vs Smithsonite fracture. Whenever a gemstone chip breaks, it leaves a characteristic line along its breakage. Such lines are known as fracture and are used to identify the gemstones in their initial stages of production when they are in the form of rough minerals. Fracture is usually described with the terms “fibrous” and “splintery” to denote a fracture that usually leaves elongated and sharp edges. Smithsonite fracture is Brittle, Gemstones of the world (2001) More from other references, Metallic, Sub-Conchoidal, Uneven and UnevenWalter Schumann.

Cubic Zirconia Vs Smithsonite Luster

A primary knowledge about Cubic Zirconia vs Smithsonite luster is useful in apparent identifications of these gemstones. Luster is the measure of light that gets reflected when incident on a finished cut gemstone. There are two major types of lusters: Silky and Adamantine. Since luster varies between two crystals of even the same gemstone, luster is limited to basic identification criteria. Smithsonite, on other hand, exhibits Pearly and Vitreous luster.