×

Emerald
Emerald

Chrysocolla
Chrysocolla



ADD
Compare
X
Emerald
X
Chrysocolla

Emerald Vs Chrysocolla

1 Astrology
1.1 Origin
Colombia, Zambia, Brazil, Madagascar, Southern and central Africa, Zimbabwe, Russia, India, Pakistan, Australia, USA, Not Available, Mexico, Spain
Southern and central Africa, Sixth Edition (2006)
1.2 Color
Green, Green, Blue, Yellow, Grey
Blue, Green, Blue, Brown
1.3 Streak
White
White, Blue, Green
1.4 For which Rashi?
Taurus, Gemini, Aries, Taurus, Gemini, Aries, Taurus, Gemini, Aries
Taurus
1.5 Planet
Venus, Mercury
Venus
1.6 Element of Planets
Earth
Water
1.7 How to Wear?
1.7.1 Finger
Not Available
Not Available
1.7.2 Ring Metal
Gold
Not Available
1.8 Energy
Receptive
Receptive
1.9 Deities
Diana, Artemis, Venus, Freyja
Venus
1.10 Not to wear with
Red Coral, Natural Pearl, Moonstone, Ruby, Red Coral, Natural Pearl, Moonstone, Ruby
Not Available
1.11 Powers
Money, Protection, Love, Courage
Love
1.12 Birthstone
1.12.1 Planetary
Taurus
Not Available
1.12.2 Talisman
Gemini
Not Available
2 Physical Properties
2.1 Tenacity
Not Available
Brittle
2.2 Solubility
Not Available
Not Available
2.3 Durability
Hard
Not Available
2.4 Specific Gravity
2.67-2.782.00-2.45
Amber
1 7.18
2.5 Fracture
Uneven, Uneven, ConchoidalWalter Schumann, Gemstones of the world (2001)
Sub-Conchoidal, ConchoidalArthur Thomas, Gemstones (2009), Brittle
2.6 Cleavage
Imperfect on the [0001]
none
2.7 Mohs Hardness
7.5-82-4
Amber
2 10
2.8 Chemical Composition
Be3Al2SiO6
Cu2H2Si2O5(OH)4
3 Optical Properties
3.1 Luster
Vitreous
Vitreous, Greasy
3.2 Pleochroism
Strong dichroism: yellow green Lazzarelli
AbsentWalter Schumann
3.3 Dispersion
0.01None
Fluorite
0.007 1
3.4 Transparency
Transparent, Translucent, Transparent to translucent
Opaque
3.5 Refractive Index
1.565-1.6021.460-1.570
Agate Opal
1 3.25
3.6 Optic Character
Not Available
Not Available
3.7 Crystal System
Hexagonal
monoclinic
3.8 Birefringence
0.0040-0.00700.023-0.050
Achroite
0 0.296
3.9 Clarity
Color grading system
Gemmological Tables (2004) More from other references
4 Benefits
4.1 Physical
4.1.1 Neurological
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.2 Cardiovascular
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.3 Respiratory
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.4 Reproductive
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.5 Digestive
Not Available
Not Available
4.2 Psychology
Not Available
Not Available
4.3 Healing
Not Available
Not Available
4.4 Qualities Associated
Not Available
Not Available

Emerald Vs Chrysocolla Fracture

Fracture is an important parameter when you compare Emerald and Chrysocolla Physical Properties. It is necessary to understand the significance of these properties, before you compare Emerald Vs Chrysocolla fracture. Whenever a gemstone chip breaks, it leaves a characteristic line along its breakage. Such lines are known as fracture and are used to identify the gemstones in their initial stages of production when they are in the form of rough minerals. Fracture is usually described with the terms “fibrous” and “splintery” to denote a fracture that usually leaves elongated and sharp edges. Fracture observed in Emerald is ConchoidalWalter Schumann, Gemstones of the world (2001), Uneven and Uneven. Chrysocolla fracture is Brittle, ConchoidalArthur Thomas, Gemstones (2009) and Sub-Conchoidal.

Emerald Vs Chrysocolla Luster

A primary knowledge about Emerald vs Chrysocolla luster is useful in apparent identifications of these gemstones. Luster is the measure of light that gets reflected when incident on a finished cut gemstone. There are two major types of lusters: Silky and Adamantine. Since luster varies between two crystals of even the same gemstone, luster is limited to basic identification criteria. Emerald exhibits Vitreous luster. Chrysocolla, on other hand, exhibits Greasy and Vitreous luster.