×

Euclase
Euclase

Carnelian
Carnelian



ADD
Compare
X
Euclase
X
Carnelian

Euclase Vs Carnelian

Add ⊕
1 Astrology
1.1 Origin
Brazil, Colombia, Southern and central Africa
Not Available
1.2 Color
Greenish, Blue, Colorless, White, Green
Red
1.3 Streak
White
White
1.4 For which Rashi?
Not Available
Taurus, Leo, Taurus, Leo, Taurus, Leo
1.5 Planet
Not Available
Sun
1.6 Element of Planets
Not Available
Not Available
1.7 How to Wear?
1.7.1 Finger
Not Available
Not Available
1.7.2 Ring Metal
Not Available
Not Available
1.8 Energy
Not Available
Projective
1.9 Deities
Not Available
Isis, Bragi
1.10 Not to wear with
Not Available
Not Available
1.11 Powers
Not Available
Protection, Healing, Courage
1.12 Birthstone
1.12.1 Planetary
Not Available
Not Available
1.12.2 Talisman
Not Available
Not Available
2 Physical Properties
2.1 Tenacity
Not Available
Not Available
2.2 Solubility
Not Available
Not Available
2.3 Durability
Not Available
Not Available
2.4 Specific Gravity
3.08-3.122.58-2.64
Amber
1 7.18
2.5 Fracture
ConchoidalWalter Schumann, Gemstones of the world (2001), ConchoidalWalter Schumann, Gemstones of the world (2001), Brittle, Metallic
Uneven, Splintery, Conchoidal, UnevenWalter Schumann, Gemstones of the world (2001)
2.6 Cleavage
{010} Perfect
Absent
2.7 Mohs Hardness
7.56.5-7
Amber
2 10
2.8 Chemical Composition
BeAlSiO 4(OH)Michael O’Donoghue , Gems, Sixth Edition (2006) More from other references
SiO2
3 Optical Properties
3.1 Luster
Vitreous
Vitreous
3.2 Pleochroism
Weak: colorless-(greenish) yellow
AbsentWalter Schumann
3.3 Dispersion
0.02None
Fluorite
0.007 1
3.4 Transparency
Gemmological Tables (2004) More from other references
Translucent, Transparent to nearly opaque
3.5 Refractive Index
1.650-1.6771.535-1.539
Agate Opal
1 3.25
3.6 Optic Character
Not Available
Not Available
3.7 Crystal System
Monoclinic Prismatic H-M Symbol (2/m) Space Group: P 21/a
Trigonal
3.8 Birefringence
0.019-0.0250.003-0.009
Achroite
0 0.296
3.9 Clarity
TransparentUlrich Henn and Claudio C. Milisenda
Translucent
4 Benefits
4.1 Physical
4.1.1 Neurological
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.2 Cardiovascular
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.3 Respiratory
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.4 Reproductive
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.5 Digestive
Not Available
Not Available
4.2 Psychology
Not Available
Not Available
4.3 Healing
Not Available
Not Available
4.4 Qualities Associated
Not Available
Not Available

Euclase Vs Carnelian Fracture

Fracture is an important parameter when you compare Euclase and Carnelian Physical Properties. It is necessary to understand the significance of these properties, before you compare Euclase Vs Carnelian fracture. Whenever a gemstone chip breaks, it leaves a characteristic line along its breakage. Such lines are known as fracture and are used to identify the gemstones in their initial stages of production when they are in the form of rough minerals. Fracture is usually described with the terms “fibrous” and “splintery” to denote a fracture that usually leaves elongated and sharp edges. Fracture observed in Euclase is Brittle, ConchoidalWalter Schumann, ConchoidalWalter Schumann, Gemstones of the world (2001), Gemstones of the world (2001) and Metallic. Carnelian fracture is Conchoidal, Gemstones of the world (2001), Splintery, Uneven and UnevenWalter Schumann.

Euclase Vs Carnelian Luster

A primary knowledge about Euclase vs Carnelian luster is useful in apparent identifications of these gemstones. Luster is the measure of light that gets reflected when incident on a finished cut gemstone. There are two major types of lusters: Silky and Adamantine. Since luster varies between two crystals of even the same gemstone, luster is limited to basic identification criteria. Euclase exhibits Vitreous luster. Carnelian, on other hand, exhibits Vitreous luster.