×

Euclase
Euclase

Magnesite
Magnesite



ADD
Compare
X
Euclase
X
Magnesite

Euclase Vs Magnesite

Add ⊕
1 Astrology
1.1 Origin
Brazil, Colombia, Southern and central Africa
Brazil
1.2 Color
Greenish, Blue, Colorless, White, Green
Yellow, Brown, Black, Colorless, White, Brownish
1.3 Streak
White
White
1.4 For which Rashi?
Not Available
Not Available
1.5 Planet
Not Available
Not Available
1.6 Element of Planets
Not Available
Not Available
1.7 How to Wear?
1.7.1 Finger
Not Available
Not Available
1.7.2 Ring Metal
Not Available
Not Available
1.8 Energy
Not Available
Not Available
1.9 Deities
Not Available
Not Available
1.10 Not to wear with
Not Available
Not Available
1.11 Powers
Not Available
Not Available
1.12 Birthstone
1.12.1 Planetary
Not Available
Not Available
1.12.2 Talisman
Not Available
Not Available
2 Physical Properties
2.1 Tenacity
Not Available
Brittle
2.2 Solubility
Not Available
Effervesces in hot HCl
2.3 Durability
Not Available
Not Available
2.4 Specific Gravity
3.08-3.122.92-3.12
Amber
1 7.18
2.5 Fracture
ConchoidalWalter Schumann, Gemstones of the world (2001), ConchoidalWalter Schumann, Gemstones of the world (2001), Brittle, Metallic
Conchoidal, ConchoidalArthur Thomas, Gemstones (2009), Brittle
2.6 Cleavage
{010} Perfect
[10 1 1] perfect
2.7 Mohs Hardness
7.53.5-4.5
Amber
2 10
2.8 Chemical Composition
BeAlSiO 4(OH)Michael O’Donoghue , Gems, Sixth Edition (2006) More from other references
MgCO 3Michael O’Donoghue , Gems, Sixth Edition (2006) More from other references
3 Optical Properties
3.1 Luster
Vitreous
Vitreous
3.2 Pleochroism
Weak: colorless-(greenish) yellow
NilArthur Thomas
3.3 Dispersion
0.02NA
Fluorite
0.007 1
3.4 Transparency
Gemmological Tables (2004) More from other references
Translucent
3.5 Refractive Index
1.650-1.6771.509-1.720
Agate Opal
1 3.25
3.6 Optic Character
Not Available
Not Available
3.7 Crystal System
Monoclinic Prismatic H-M Symbol (2/m) Space Group: P 21/a
Trigonal
3.8 Birefringence
0.019-0.0250.191
Achroite
0 0.296
3.9 Clarity
TransparentUlrich Henn and Claudio C. Milisenda
Translucent
4 Benefits
4.1 Physical
4.1.1 Neurological
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.2 Cardiovascular
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.3 Respiratory
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.4 Reproductive
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.5 Digestive
Not Available
Not Available
4.2 Psychology
Not Available
Not Available
4.3 Healing
Not Available
Not Available
4.4 Qualities Associated
Not Available
Not Available

Euclase Vs Magnesite Fracture

Fracture is an important parameter when you compare Euclase and Magnesite Physical Properties. It is necessary to understand the significance of these properties, before you compare Euclase Vs Magnesite fracture. Whenever a gemstone chip breaks, it leaves a characteristic line along its breakage. Such lines are known as fracture and are used to identify the gemstones in their initial stages of production when they are in the form of rough minerals. Fracture is usually described with the terms “fibrous” and “splintery” to denote a fracture that usually leaves elongated and sharp edges. Fracture observed in Euclase is Brittle, ConchoidalWalter Schumann, ConchoidalWalter Schumann, Gemstones of the world (2001), Gemstones of the world (2001) and Metallic. Magnesite fracture is Brittle, Conchoidal, ConchoidalArthur Thomas and Gemstones (2009).

Euclase Vs Magnesite Luster

A primary knowledge about Euclase vs Magnesite luster is useful in apparent identifications of these gemstones. Luster is the measure of light that gets reflected when incident on a finished cut gemstone. There are two major types of lusters: Silky and Adamantine. Since luster varies between two crystals of even the same gemstone, luster is limited to basic identification criteria. Euclase exhibits Vitreous luster. Magnesite, on other hand, exhibits Vitreous luster.