×

Fayalite
Fayalite

Chrome Diopside
Chrome Diopside



ADD
Compare
X
Fayalite
X
Chrome Diopside

Fayalite Vs Chrome Diopside

1 Astrology
1.1 Origin
Southern and central Africa
Russia, green, violet, Yellow, blue, green, violet, Yellow, blue
1.2 Color
Yellow, Brown, Black, Black
Black, Violet, Blue, Green
1.3 Streak
White
Not Available
1.4 For which Rashi?
Not Available
Gemini, Virgo, Gemini, Virgo, Gemini, Virgo
1.5 Planet
Not Available
Mercury
1.6 Element of Planets
Not Available
Earth
1.7 How to Wear?
1.7.1 Finger
Not Available
Not Available
1.7.2 Ring Metal
Not Available
Not Available
1.8 Energy
Not Available
Receptive
1.9 Deities
Not Available
Gia
1.10 Not to wear with
Not Available
Not Available
1.11 Powers
Not Available
Not Available
1.12 Birthstone
1.12.1 Planetary
Not Available
Not Available
1.12.2 Talisman
Not Available
Not Available
2 Physical Properties
2.1 Tenacity
Not Available
Not Available
2.2 Solubility
Not Available
Not Available
2.3 Durability
Not Available
Not Available
2.4 Specific Gravity
4.3923.22-3.40
Amber
1 7.18
2.5 Fracture
Conchoidal, ConchoidalAnthony et al, Handbook of mineralogy (2001), Conchoidal, Brittle
ConchoidalArthur Thomas, Gemstones (2009), ConchoidalArthur Thomas, Gemstones (2009)
2.6 Cleavage
{010} moderate, {100} imperfect
1,2 prismatic.
2.7 Mohs Hardness
6.5-75-6
Amber
2 10
2.8 Chemical Composition
Fe 2SiO 4Michael O’Donoghue , Gems, Sixth Edition (2006)
(Ca,Cr)MgSi 2O 6Gemdat.org , Management Team (2012)
3 Optical Properties
3.1 Luster
Vitreous, Resinous
Vitreous
3.2 Pleochroism
Faint
Common trichroism: light green
3.3 Dispersion
NANA
Fluorite
0.007 1
3.4 Transparency
TransparentAnthony et al, Handbook of mineralogy (2001)
Gems, Sixth Edition (2006)
3.5 Refractive Index
1.827-1.8791.668-1.703
Agate Opal
1 3.25
3.6 Optic Character
Not Available
Not Available
3.7 Crystal System
Orthorhombic
monoclinic
3.8 Birefringence
0.042-0.0510.024-0.030
Achroite
0 0.296
3.9 Clarity
TransparentAnthony et al
Gems
4 Benefits
4.1 Physical
4.1.1 Neurological
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.2 Cardiovascular
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.3 Respiratory
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.4 Reproductive
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.5 Digestive
Not Available
Not Available
4.2 Psychology
Not Available
Not Available
4.3 Healing
Not Available
Not Available
4.4 Qualities Associated
Not Available
Not Available

Fayalite Vs Chrome Diopside Fracture

Fracture is an important parameter when you compare Fayalite and Chrome Diopside Physical Properties. It is necessary to understand the significance of these properties, before you compare Fayalite Vs Chrome Diopside fracture. Whenever a gemstone chip breaks, it leaves a characteristic line along its breakage. Such lines are known as fracture and are used to identify the gemstones in their initial stages of production when they are in the form of rough minerals. Fracture is usually described with the terms “fibrous” and “splintery” to denote a fracture that usually leaves elongated and sharp edges. Fracture observed in Fayalite is Brittle, Conchoidal, Conchoidal, ConchoidalAnthony et al and Handbook of mineralogy (2001). Chrome Diopside fracture is ConchoidalArthur Thomas, ConchoidalArthur Thomas, Gemstones (2009) and Gemstones (2009).

Fayalite Vs Chrome Diopside Luster

A primary knowledge about Fayalite vs Chrome Diopside luster is useful in apparent identifications of these gemstones. Luster is the measure of light that gets reflected when incident on a finished cut gemstone. There are two major types of lusters: Silky and Adamantine. Since luster varies between two crystals of even the same gemstone, luster is limited to basic identification criteria. Fayalite exhibits Resinous and Vitreous luster. Chrome Diopside, on other hand, exhibits Vitreous luster.