Garnet Malaia

Anthophyllite

Garnet Malaia Vs Anthophyllite

Garnet Malaia

Anthophyllite

Add ⊕

1 Astrology

1.1 Origin

Madagascar, Tanzania

Not Available, Southern and central Africa

1.2 Color

White, Colorless, Blue, Red, Green, Yellow, Violet

Brown, White, Greenish, gray, Green, Brown, Brownish, White, Greenish, gray, Green, Brown, Brownish

1.3 Streak

Not Available

gray

1.4 For which Rashi?

Not Available

1.5 Planet

Not Available

1.6 Element of Planets

Not Available

1.7 How to Wear?

1.7.1 Finger

Not Available

1.7.2 Ring Metal

Not Available

1.8 Energy

Not Available

1.9 Deities

Not Available

1.10 Not to wear with

Not Available

1.11 Powers

Not Available

1.12 Birthstone

1.12.1 Planetary

Not Available

1.12.2 Talisman

Not Available

2 Physical Properties

2.1 Tenacity

Not Available

2.2 Solubility

Not Available

2.3 Durability

Not Available

2.4 Specific Gravity

Not Available2.9-3.5

1 7.18

2.5 Fracture

Not Available

Conchoidal, Brittle, Conchoidal, Brittle, Conchoidal, Brittle

2.6 Cleavage

Not Available

{110} Perfect, {???} Distinct, {???} Distinct

2.7 Mohs Hardness

7-7.55.5-6

2 10

2.8 Chemical Composition

Not Available

(Mg,Fe2+ ) 2(Mg,Fe2+ ) 5Si 8O 22(OH) 2Anthony et al , Handbook of mineralogy (2001)

3 Optical Properties

3.1 Luster

Not Available

Vitreous, Pearly

3.2 Pleochroism

Not Available

When Fe-rich

3.3 Dispersion

NANA

0.007 1

3.4 Transparency

Not Available

Transparent

3.5 Refractive Index

1.73-1.811.603-1.690

1 3.25

3.6 Optic Character

Not Available

Biaxial/+

3.7 Crystal System

Isometric

Orthorhombic Dipyramidal H-M Symbol (2/m 2/m 2/m) Space Group: P nma

3.8 Birefringence

Not AvailableNot Available

0 0.296

3.9 Clarity

Color grading system

Transparent

4 Benefits

4.1 Physical

4.1.1 Neurological

Not Available

4.1.2 Cardiovascular

Not Available

4.1.3 Respiratory

Not Available

4.1.4 Reproductive

Not Available

4.1.5 Digestive

Not Available

4.2 Psychology

Not Available

4.3 Healing

Not Available

4.4 Qualities Associated

Not Available

Garnet Malaia Vs Anthophyllite Fracture

Fracture is an important parameter when you compare Garnet Malaia and Anthophyllite Physical Properties. It is necessary to understand the significance of these properties, before you compare Garnet Malaia Vs Anthophyllite fracture. Whenever a gemstone chip breaks, it leaves a characteristic line along its breakage. Such lines are known as fracture and are used to identify the gemstones in their initial stages of production when they are in the form of rough minerals. Fracture is usually described with the terms “fibrous” and “splintery” to denote a fracture that usually leaves elongated and sharp edges. Anthophyllite fracture is Brittle, Brittle, Brittle, Conchoidal, Conchoidal and Conchoidal.

Compare Blue Gemstones

Garnet Malaia Vs Barite

Garnet Malaia Vs Aqua Aura

Garnet Malaia Vs Angelite

Garnet Malaia Vs Anthophyllite Luster

A primary knowledge about Garnet Malaia vs Anthophyllite luster is useful in apparent identifications of these gemstones. Luster is the measure of light that gets reflected when incident on a finished cut gemstone. There are two major types of lusters: Silky and Adamantine. Since luster varies between two crystals of even the same gemstone, luster is limited to basic identification criteria. Anthophyllite, on other hand, exhibits Pearly and Vitreous luster.