×

Garnet Malaia
Garnet Malaia

Phenakite
Phenakite



ADD
Compare
X
Garnet Malaia
X
Phenakite

Garnet Malaia Vs Phenakite

1 Astrology
1.1 Origin
Madagascar, Tanzania
USA, Brazyl, Switzerland, Tanzania, Madagascar, Russia, Sri Lanka
1.2 Color
White, Colorless, Blue, Red, Green, Yellow, Violet
Colorless, Yellow, pink, Red
1.3 Streak
Not Available
White
1.4 For which Rashi?
Not Available
Not Available
1.5 Planet
Not Available
Not Available
1.6 Element of Planets
Not Available
Not Available
1.7 How to Wear?
1.7.1 Finger
Not Available
Not Available
1.7.2 Ring Metal
Not Available
Not Available
1.8 Energy
Not Available
Not Available
1.9 Deities
Not Available
Not Available
1.10 Not to wear with
Not Available
Not Available
1.11 Powers
Not Available
Not Available
1.12 Birthstone
1.12.1 Planetary
Not Available
Not Available
1.12.2 Talisman
Not Available
Not Available
2 Physical Properties
2.1 Tenacity
Not Available
Brittle
2.2 Solubility
Not Available
Not Available
2.3 Durability
Not Available
Not Available
2.4 Specific Gravity
Not Available2.90-2.98
Amber
1 7.18
2.5 Fracture
Not Available
Conchoidal, ConchoidalWalter Schumann, Gemstones of the world (2001), Brittle
2.6 Cleavage
Not Available
Distinct on {11 2 0}, imperfect on {10 1 1}
2.7 Mohs Hardness
7-7.57.5-8
Amber
2 10
2.8 Chemical Composition
Not Available
Be 2SiO 4Michael O’Donoghue , Gems, Sixth Edition (2006) More from other references
3 Optical Properties
3.1 Luster
Not Available
Vitreous
3.2 Pleochroism
Not Available
Distinct: colorless orangy-yellowHerve Nicolas Lazzarelli
3.3 Dispersion
NA0.02
Fluorite
0.007 1
3.4 Transparency
Not Available
Gemmological Tables (2004) More from other references
3.5 Refractive Index
1.73-1.811.650-1.695
Agate Opal
1 3.25
3.6 Optic Character
Not Available
Not Available
3.7 Crystal System
Isometric
Trigonal
3.8 Birefringence
Not Available0.016
Achroite
0 0.296
3.9 Clarity
Color grading system
TransparentUlrich Henn and Claudio C. Milisenda
4 Benefits
4.1 Physical
4.1.1 Neurological
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.2 Cardiovascular
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.3 Respiratory
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.4 Reproductive
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.5 Digestive
Not Available
Not Available
4.2 Psychology
Not Available
Not Available
4.3 Healing
Not Available
Not Available
4.4 Qualities Associated
Not Available
Not Available

Garnet Malaia Vs Phenakite Fracture

Fracture is an important parameter when you compare Garnet Malaia and Phenakite Physical Properties. It is necessary to understand the significance of these properties, before you compare Garnet Malaia Vs Phenakite fracture. Whenever a gemstone chip breaks, it leaves a characteristic line along its breakage. Such lines are known as fracture and are used to identify the gemstones in their initial stages of production when they are in the form of rough minerals. Fracture is usually described with the terms “fibrous” and “splintery” to denote a fracture that usually leaves elongated and sharp edges. Phenakite fracture is Brittle, Conchoidal, ConchoidalWalter Schumann and Gemstones of the world (2001).

Garnet Malaia Vs Phenakite Luster

A primary knowledge about Garnet Malaia vs Phenakite luster is useful in apparent identifications of these gemstones. Luster is the measure of light that gets reflected when incident on a finished cut gemstone. There are two major types of lusters: Silky and Adamantine. Since luster varies between two crystals of even the same gemstone, luster is limited to basic identification criteria. Phenakite, on other hand, exhibits Vitreous luster.