×

Kornerupine
Kornerupine

Clinochlore
Clinochlore



ADD
Compare
X
Kornerupine
X
Clinochlore

Kornerupine Vs Clinochlore

1 Astrology
1.1 Origin
Tanzania, Madagascar, Kenya, Sri Lanka, Burma, Australia
Southern and central Africa
1.2 Color
Green, Brown, Colorless, Greenish, Yellow
Green, Grey, Green, White
1.3 Streak
White
White
1.4 For which Rashi?
Not Available
Not Available
1.5 Planet
Not Available
Not Available
1.6 Element of Planets
Not Available
Not Available
1.7 How to Wear?
1.7.1 Finger
Not Available
Not Available
1.7.2 Ring Metal
Not Available
Not Available
1.8 Energy
Not Available
Not Available
1.9 Deities
Not Available
Not Available
1.10 Not to wear with
Not Available
Not Available
1.11 Powers
Not Available
Not Available
1.12 Birthstone
1.12.1 Planetary
Not Available
Not Available
1.12.2 Talisman
Not Available
Not Available
2 Physical Properties
2.1 Tenacity
Not Available
Not Available
2.2 Solubility
Not Available
Not Available
2.3 Durability
Not Available
Not Available
2.4 Specific Gravity
3.25-3.452.60-3.02
Amber
1 7.18
2.5 Fracture
ConchoidalArthur Thomas, Gemstones (2009), ConchoidalArthur Thomas, Gemstones (2009), Brittle, Uneven
Uneven
2.6 Cleavage
Good on {110}
{001} Perfect
2.7 Mohs Hardness
6.52-2.5
Amber
2 10
2.8 Chemical Composition
Mg 3Al 6(Si,Al,B) 5O 21(OH)Walter Schumann , Gemstones of the world (2001) More from other references
(Mg,Fe2+ ) 5Al(Si 3Al)O 10(OH) 8Anthony et al , Handbook of mineralogy (2001)
3 Optical Properties
3.1 Luster
Vitreous
Pearly, Greasy
3.2 Pleochroism
X = colorless to green; Y = colorless
Distinct: light yellow-green to light bluE
3.3 Dispersion
0.02NA
Fluorite
0.007 1
3.4 Transparency
Gemmological Tables (2004) More from other references
Transparent
3.5 Refractive Index
1.660-1.6851.571-1.597
Agate Opal
1 3.25
3.6 Optic Character
Not Available
Biaxial/+
3.7 Crystal System
Orthorhombic
Monoclinic Prismatic H-M Symbol (2/m) Space Group: C 2/m
3.8 Birefringence
0.012-0.017Not Available
Achroite
0 0.296
3.9 Clarity
TransparentUlrich Henn and Claudio C. Milisenda
Transparent
4 Benefits
4.1 Physical
4.1.1 Neurological
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.2 Cardiovascular
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.3 Respiratory
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.4 Reproductive
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.5 Digestive
Not Available
Not Available
4.2 Psychology
Not Available
Not Available
4.3 Healing
Not Available
Not Available
4.4 Qualities Associated
Not Available
Not Available

Kornerupine Vs Clinochlore Fracture

Fracture is an important parameter when you compare Kornerupine and Clinochlore Physical Properties. It is necessary to understand the significance of these properties, before you compare Kornerupine Vs Clinochlore fracture. Whenever a gemstone chip breaks, it leaves a characteristic line along its breakage. Such lines are known as fracture and are used to identify the gemstones in their initial stages of production when they are in the form of rough minerals. Fracture is usually described with the terms “fibrous” and “splintery” to denote a fracture that usually leaves elongated and sharp edges. Fracture observed in Kornerupine is Brittle, ConchoidalArthur Thomas, ConchoidalArthur Thomas, Gemstones (2009), Gemstones (2009) and Uneven. Clinochlore fracture is Uneven.

Kornerupine Vs Clinochlore Luster

A primary knowledge about Kornerupine vs Clinochlore luster is useful in apparent identifications of these gemstones. Luster is the measure of light that gets reflected when incident on a finished cut gemstone. There are two major types of lusters: Silky and Adamantine. Since luster varies between two crystals of even the same gemstone, luster is limited to basic identification criteria. Kornerupine exhibits Vitreous luster. Clinochlore, on other hand, exhibits Greasy and Pearly luster.