×

Kornerupine
Kornerupine

Microcline
Microcline



ADD
Compare
X
Kornerupine
X
Microcline

Kornerupine Vs Microcline

1 Astrology
1.1 Origin
Tanzania, Madagascar, Kenya, Sri Lanka, Burma, Australia
Madagascar, Southern and central Africa
1.2 Color
Green, Brown, Colorless, Greenish, Yellow
White, Yellow, Blue, Green, Green, gray, Yellow
1.3 Streak
White
White
1.4 For which Rashi?
Not Available
Not Available
1.5 Planet
Not Available
Not Available
1.6 Element of Planets
Not Available
Not Available
1.7 How to Wear?
1.7.1 Finger
Not Available
Not Available
1.7.2 Ring Metal
Not Available
Not Available
1.8 Energy
Not Available
Not Available
1.9 Deities
Not Available
Not Available
1.10 Not to wear with
Not Available
Not Available
1.11 Powers
Not Available
Not Available
1.12 Birthstone
1.12.1 Planetary
Not Available
Not Available
1.12.2 Talisman
Not Available
Not Available
2 Physical Properties
2.1 Tenacity
Not Available
Not Available
2.2 Solubility
Not Available
Not Available
2.3 Durability
Not Available
Not Available
2.4 Specific Gravity
3.25-3.452.55-2.63
Amber
1 7.18
2.5 Fracture
ConchoidalArthur Thomas, Gemstones (2009), ConchoidalArthur Thomas, Gemstones (2009), Brittle, Uneven
Uneven, Uneven, Gems
2.6 Cleavage
Good on {110}
{001} Perfect, {010} Good
2.7 Mohs Hardness
6.56-6.5
Amber
2 10
2.8 Chemical Composition
Mg 3Al 6(Si,Al,B) 5O 21(OH)Walter Schumann , Gemstones of the world (2001) More from other references
KAlSi 3O 8Arthur Thomas , Gemstones (2009)
3 Optical Properties
3.1 Luster
Vitreous
Vitreous
3.2 Pleochroism
X = colorless to green; Y = colorless
WeakMichael O’Donoghue
3.3 Dispersion
0.02NA
Fluorite
0.007 1
3.4 Transparency
Gemmological Tables (2004) More from other references
Translucent
3.5 Refractive Index
1.660-1.6851.514-1.539
Agate Opal
1 3.25
3.6 Optic Character
Not Available
Not Available
3.7 Crystal System
Orthorhombic
Triclinic Pinacoidal H-M Symbol ( 1) Space Group: C1
3.8 Birefringence
0.012-0.0170.008-0.010
Achroite
0 0.296
3.9 Clarity
TransparentUlrich Henn and Claudio C. Milisenda
Translucent
4 Benefits
4.1 Physical
4.1.1 Neurological
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.2 Cardiovascular
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.3 Respiratory
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.4 Reproductive
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.5 Digestive
Not Available
Not Available
4.2 Psychology
Not Available
Not Available
4.3 Healing
Not Available
Not Available
4.4 Qualities Associated
Not Available
Not Available

Kornerupine Vs Microcline Fracture

Fracture is an important parameter when you compare Kornerupine and Microcline Physical Properties. It is necessary to understand the significance of these properties, before you compare Kornerupine Vs Microcline fracture. Whenever a gemstone chip breaks, it leaves a characteristic line along its breakage. Such lines are known as fracture and are used to identify the gemstones in their initial stages of production when they are in the form of rough minerals. Fracture is usually described with the terms “fibrous” and “splintery” to denote a fracture that usually leaves elongated and sharp edges. Fracture observed in Kornerupine is Brittle, ConchoidalArthur Thomas, ConchoidalArthur Thomas, Gemstones (2009), Gemstones (2009) and Uneven. Microcline fracture is Gems, Uneven and Uneven.

Kornerupine Vs Microcline Luster

A primary knowledge about Kornerupine vs Microcline luster is useful in apparent identifications of these gemstones. Luster is the measure of light that gets reflected when incident on a finished cut gemstone. There are two major types of lusters: Silky and Adamantine. Since luster varies between two crystals of even the same gemstone, luster is limited to basic identification criteria. Kornerupine exhibits Vitreous luster. Microcline, on other hand, exhibits Vitreous luster.