×

Larimar
Larimar

Chrysocolla
Chrysocolla



ADD
Compare
X
Larimar
X
Chrysocolla

Larimar Vs Chrysocolla

1 Astrology
1.1 Origin
Not Available, blue
Southern and central Africa, Sixth Edition (2006)
1.2 Color
White
Blue, Green, Blue, Brown
1.3 Streak
Not Available
White, Blue, Green
1.4 For which Rashi?
Pisces
Taurus
1.5 Planet
Neptune
Venus
1.6 Element of Planets
Not Available
Water
1.7 How to Wear?
1.7.1 Finger
Not Available
Not Available
1.7.2 Ring Metal
Not Available
Not Available
1.8 Energy
Receptive
Receptive
1.9 Deities
Gia
Venus
1.10 Not to wear with
Not Available
Not Available
1.11 Powers
Healing
Love
1.12 Birthstone
1.12.1 Planetary
Not Available
Not Available
1.12.2 Talisman
All
Not Available
2 Physical Properties
2.1 Tenacity
Not Available
Brittle
2.2 Solubility
Not Available
Not Available
2.3 Durability
Not Available
Not Available
2.4 Specific Gravity
2.74-2.902.00-2.45
Amber
1 7.18
2.5 Fracture
Not Available
Sub-Conchoidal, ConchoidalArthur Thomas, Gemstones (2009), Brittle
2.6 Cleavage
Not Available
none
2.7 Mohs Hardness
52-4
Amber
2 10
2.8 Chemical Composition
Ca 2NaHSi 3O 9Ulrich Henn and Claudio C.
Cu2H2Si2O5(OH)4
3 Optical Properties
3.1 Luster
Not Available
Vitreous, Greasy
3.2 Pleochroism
Not Available
AbsentWalter Schumann
3.3 Dispersion
NANone
Fluorite
0.007 1
3.4 Transparency
Gemmological Tables (2004)
Opaque
3.5 Refractive Index
1.595-1.6451.460-1.570
Agate Opal
1 3.25
3.6 Optic Character
Not Available
Not Available
3.7 Crystal System
monoclinic
monoclinic
3.8 Birefringence
0.032-0.0380.023-0.050
Achroite
0 0.296
3.9 Clarity
Gemmological Tables (2004)
Gemmological Tables (2004) More from other references
4 Benefits
4.1 Physical
4.1.1 Neurological
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.2 Cardiovascular
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.3 Respiratory
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.4 Reproductive
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.5 Digestive
Not Available
Not Available
4.2 Psychology
Not Available
Not Available
4.3 Healing
Not Available
Not Available
4.4 Qualities Associated
Not Available
Not Available

Larimar Vs Chrysocolla Fracture

Fracture is an important parameter when you compare Larimar and Chrysocolla Physical Properties. It is necessary to understand the significance of these properties, before you compare Larimar Vs Chrysocolla fracture. Whenever a gemstone chip breaks, it leaves a characteristic line along its breakage. Such lines are known as fracture and are used to identify the gemstones in their initial stages of production when they are in the form of rough minerals. Fracture is usually described with the terms “fibrous” and “splintery” to denote a fracture that usually leaves elongated and sharp edges. Chrysocolla fracture is Brittle, ConchoidalArthur Thomas, Gemstones (2009) and Sub-Conchoidal.

Larimar Vs Chrysocolla Luster

A primary knowledge about Larimar vs Chrysocolla luster is useful in apparent identifications of these gemstones. Luster is the measure of light that gets reflected when incident on a finished cut gemstone. There are two major types of lusters: Silky and Adamantine. Since luster varies between two crystals of even the same gemstone, luster is limited to basic identification criteria. Chrysocolla, on other hand, exhibits Greasy and Vitreous luster.