×

Nifontovite
Nifontovite

Topaz
Topaz



ADD
Compare
X
Nifontovite
X
Topaz

Nifontovite Vs Topaz

Add ⊕
1 Astrology
1.1 Origin
Mexico
Brazil, Madagascar, Russia, USA, Mexico, Pakistan, brown, Yellow, Orange, Brazil, Sri Lanka, Pakistan, Russia, brown, Yellow, Orange, Brazil, Sri Lanka, Pakistan, Russia
1.2 Color
Colorless, Grey, gray
Yellow, Blue, Green, Red, White, Colorless, Blue, Red, Green, Yellow, pink, Brown
1.3 Streak
White
White
1.4 For which Rashi?
Not Available
Sagittarius
1.5 Planet
Not Available
Sun
1.6 Element of Planets
Not Available
Not Available
1.7 How to Wear?
1.7.1 Finger
Not Available
Not Available
1.7.2 Ring Metal
Not Available
Not Available
1.8 Energy
Not Available
Projective
1.9 Deities
Not Available
Ra
1.10 Not to wear with
Not Available
Not Available
1.11 Powers
Not Available
Healing, Love, Money
1.12 Birthstone
1.12.1 Planetary
Not Available
Not Available
1.12.2 Talisman
Not Available
Not Available
2 Physical Properties
2.1 Tenacity
Not Available
Not Available
2.2 Solubility
Not Available
Not Available
2.3 Durability
Not Available
Not Available
2.4 Specific Gravity
2.35-2.363.49-3.57
Amber
1 7.18
2.5 Fracture
Not Available
Subconchoidal, Uneven, ConchoidalArthur Thomas, Gemstones (2009), Brittle
2.6 Cleavage
{???} Indistinct
[001] Perfect
2.7 Mohs Hardness
3.5-58
Amber
2 10
2.8 Chemical Composition
Ca 3B 6O 6(OH) 12 · 2H 2OAnthony et al , Handbook of Mineralogy (2001)
Al2SiO4(F,OH)2
3 Optical Properties
3.1 Luster
Not Available
Vitreous
3.2 Pleochroism
Not Available
Weak
3.3 Dispersion
NA0.01
Fluorite
0.007 1
3.4 Transparency
Transparent
Transparent
3.5 Refractive Index
1.573-1.5851.606-1.644
Agate Opal
1 3.25
3.6 Optic Character
Not Available
Not Available
3.7 Crystal System
Not Available
Orthorhombic
3.8 Birefringence
Not Available0.008-0.011
Achroite
0 0.296
3.9 Clarity
Transparent
TransparentUlrich Henn and Claudio C. Milisenda
4 Benefits
4.1 Physical
4.1.1 Neurological
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.2 Cardiovascular
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.3 Respiratory
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.4 Reproductive
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.5 Digestive
Not Available
Not Available
4.2 Psychology
Not Available
Not Available
4.3 Healing
Not Available
Not Available
4.4 Qualities Associated
Not Available
Not Available

Nifontovite Vs Topaz Fracture

Fracture is an important parameter when you compare Nifontovite and Topaz Physical Properties. It is necessary to understand the significance of these properties, before you compare Nifontovite Vs Topaz fracture. Whenever a gemstone chip breaks, it leaves a characteristic line along its breakage. Such lines are known as fracture and are used to identify the gemstones in their initial stages of production when they are in the form of rough minerals. Fracture is usually described with the terms “fibrous” and “splintery” to denote a fracture that usually leaves elongated and sharp edges. Topaz fracture is Brittle, ConchoidalArthur Thomas, Gemstones (2009), Subconchoidal and Uneven.

Nifontovite Vs Topaz Luster

A primary knowledge about Nifontovite vs Topaz luster is useful in apparent identifications of these gemstones. Luster is the measure of light that gets reflected when incident on a finished cut gemstone. There are two major types of lusters: Silky and Adamantine. Since luster varies between two crystals of even the same gemstone, luster is limited to basic identification criteria. Topaz, on other hand, exhibits Vitreous luster.