×

Omphacite
Omphacite

Chrysocolla
Chrysocolla



ADD
Compare
X
Omphacite
X
Chrysocolla

Omphacite Vs Chrysocolla

1 Astrology
1.1 Origin
Southern and central Africa
Southern and central Africa, Sixth Edition (2006)
1.2 Color
Green
Blue, Green, Blue, Brown
1.3 Streak
Greenish, White
White, Blue, Green
1.4 For which Rashi?
Not Available
Taurus
1.5 Planet
Not Available
Venus
1.6 Element of Planets
Not Available
Water
1.7 How to Wear?
1.7.1 Finger
Not Available
Not Available
1.7.2 Ring Metal
Not Available
Not Available
1.8 Energy
Not Available
Receptive
1.9 Deities
Not Available
Venus
1.10 Not to wear with
Not Available
Not Available
1.11 Powers
Not Available
Love
1.12 Birthstone
1.12.1 Planetary
Not Available
Not Available
1.12.2 Talisman
Not Available
Not Available
2 Physical Properties
2.1 Tenacity
Not Available
Brittle
2.2 Solubility
Not Available
Not Available
2.3 Durability
Not Available
Not Available
2.4 Specific Gravity
3.16-3.432.00-2.45
Amber
1 7.18
2.5 Fracture
Uneven, Uneven, ConchoidalAnthony et al, Handbook of mineralogy (2001), Brittle, Conchoidal
Sub-Conchoidal, ConchoidalArthur Thomas, Gemstones (2009), Brittle
2.6 Cleavage
{110} Good, {110} Good
none
2.7 Mohs Hardness
5-62-4
Amber
2 10
2.8 Chemical Composition
(Ca,Na)(Mg,Fe,Al)Si 2O 6Anthony et al , Handbook of Mineralogy (2001)
Cu2H2Si2O5(OH)4
3 Optical Properties
3.1 Luster
Vitreous
Vitreous, Greasy
3.2 Pleochroism
Weak: colorless -- very pale green -- very pale green
AbsentWalter Schumann
3.3 Dispersion
NANone
Fluorite
0.007 1
3.4 Transparency
TranslucentAnthony et al, Handbook of mineralogy (2001)
Opaque
3.5 Refractive Index
1.662-1.7231.460-1.570
Agate Opal
1 3.25
3.6 Optic Character
Not Available
Not Available
3.7 Crystal System
Not Available
monoclinic
3.8 Birefringence
Not Available0.023-0.050
Achroite
0 0.296
3.9 Clarity
TranslucentAnthony et al
Gemmological Tables (2004) More from other references
4 Benefits
4.1 Physical
4.1.1 Neurological
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.2 Cardiovascular
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.3 Respiratory
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.4 Reproductive
Not Available
Not Available
4.1.5 Digestive
Not Available
Not Available
4.2 Psychology
Not Available
Not Available
4.3 Healing
Not Available
Not Available
4.4 Qualities Associated
Not Available
Not Available

Omphacite Vs Chrysocolla Fracture

Fracture is an important parameter when you compare Omphacite and Chrysocolla Physical Properties. It is necessary to understand the significance of these properties, before you compare Omphacite Vs Chrysocolla fracture. Whenever a gemstone chip breaks, it leaves a characteristic line along its breakage. Such lines are known as fracture and are used to identify the gemstones in their initial stages of production when they are in the form of rough minerals. Fracture is usually described with the terms “fibrous” and “splintery” to denote a fracture that usually leaves elongated and sharp edges. Fracture observed in Omphacite is Brittle, Conchoidal, ConchoidalAnthony et al, Handbook of mineralogy (2001), Uneven and Uneven. Chrysocolla fracture is Brittle, ConchoidalArthur Thomas, Gemstones (2009) and Sub-Conchoidal.

Omphacite Vs Chrysocolla Luster

A primary knowledge about Omphacite vs Chrysocolla luster is useful in apparent identifications of these gemstones. Luster is the measure of light that gets reflected when incident on a finished cut gemstone. There are two major types of lusters: Silky and Adamantine. Since luster varies between two crystals of even the same gemstone, luster is limited to basic identification criteria. Omphacite exhibits Vitreous luster. Chrysocolla, on other hand, exhibits Greasy and Vitreous luster.